Table of Contents
āUNC Chapel Hill Tries to Spin Away a Major Defeatā
The Clarion Call, the online newsletter of has published an Samantha and I wrote about UNC Chapel Hillās anemic attempt to spin the dismissal of a Christian fraternityās suit against them as a victory. Some of you may remember FIREhad not one but two cases at UNC Chapel Hill in less than two years, in which the university attempted to force Christian groups to sign a statement that they would not ādiscriminateā on the basis of religion. As we point out:
[C]onstitutionally protected freedom of association is meaningless if a group cannot exclude people who do not share the beliefs of the group. This is both basic common sense and clearly established law. The College Democrats can exclude Republicans, the college environmental club can exclude students who hate environmentalism, and the college chess club can exclude members who hate the game and wish to see it abolished. In other words, if you form a group in order to express commonly held ideas or ideals, of course you can exclude those who disagree.
Alpha Iota Omega (AIO), the Christian fraternity at issue in the most recent case, is an evangelical organization established for the very purpose of spreading their faith. We write, āHow exactly could someone who did not share the faith of AIO help spread the beliefs of AIO? You make a poor Christian evangelical if you show up at someoneās house saying āwhile I donāt actually believe in the divinity of Christ, I think you should convert to Christianity.āā
The case was dismissed after the Alliance Defense Fund filed suit, a court concluded the policyās application to AIO was likely highly unconstitutional, UNC rewrote its policy and recognized the Christian group. We conclude:
UNC can spin this case however it wants, but the facts are not on its side. The university wasted countless hours and taxpayer dollars in a failed attempt to exclude a Christian group that only wanted to maintain its Christian identity, and then had to change its policies and recognize the group. It lost in its attempt to tell the InterVarsity Christian Fellowship it could not limit its leadership to Christians back in 2002 (an effort also apparently spearheaded by UNC administrator Jonathan Curtis), and it lost in its attempt to tell AIO it had to admit non-Christians this time around. No matter how it spins, the score is freedom of association at UNC-Chapel Hill: 2, UNC-Chapel Hill and administrators: zero.
Recent Articles
FIREās award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
Revoking Harvardās tax-exempt status will threaten all nonprofits
Targeting Harvardās tax-exempt status for its views isnāt just political payback ā itās a threat to every nonprofitās right to dissent.
Grandpaās advice for the new wave of American censors
When Iowa officials try to silence citizens for asking tough questions, it's not just bad policy ā itās an insult to an entire generation of WWII vets and the freedoms they fought to defend.
FIREPOLL: Only 1/4 of Americans support deporting foreigners for pro-Palestinian views
The latest National Speech Index also finds that the number expressing ālittleā or ānoā confidence Donald Trump will protect First Amendment rights has risen 10 points since his inauguration.
Harvardās resistance to Trump is a model for US universities
Last week, the federal government told Harvard to end its DEI programs and change its governance, hiring, and admissions practices ā but Harvard refused to bend the knee.