¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½

Table of Contents

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute denies students permission to protest administration ā€” again

Last year, we told you about how students and faculty at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) were denied permission to hold a demonstration in support of their ā€œā€ campaign, and defied the administration by holding their demonstration anyway, cleverly labeling it a ā€œclassā€ about peaceful demonstrations. Now, RPI is once again denying students permission to hold a demonstration critical of the administration, this time during homecoming. FIREis calling on RPIā€™s administration to back down.

The long-running dispute over the Rensselaer Union involves the administrationā€™s attempts to take control of the student-run union, which houses the bookstore, spaces for student organizations, and other student services. The administration the right to appoint the Rensselaer Unionā€™s director ā€” a choice made by students for the past 125 years of the unionā€™s existence. Opponents have put together a staking out their position, complete with a tracing the current dispute to the removal of student representatives from the Board of Trustees Student Life Committee in 2008.

With homecoming approaching this weekend ā€” bringing with it alumni, donors, and other stakeholders whose presence on the campus is temporary ā€” students have again sought permission to hold a demonstration at RPI concerning the union dispute. Once again, RPIā€™s administration has denied permission, citing the need to provide security for the administrationā€™s programming.

As The Troy Record :

In a memo from Travis Apgar, assistant vice president for student life and dean of students, the college rejected an application by the group Save the Union for a peaceful demonstration between 4:30 and 11:30 p.m. Friday, Oct. 13, outside the Curtis R. Priem Experimental Media and Performing Arts Center and the Richard G. Folsom Library. Apgar specifically cites the fact that that day opens Reunion & Homecoming weekend, with Jackson hosting a black-tie event for alumni that night in EMPAC and the Folsom Library to launch the collegeā€™s capital campaign.

Apgar said security demands were the administrationā€™s primary concern.

ā€œRensselaerā€™s Public Safety team will be fully occupied in providing security for these events in addition to their normal safety and security work,ā€ Apgar wrote. ā€œGiven the potential for a demonstration to disrupt these events and to exceed our capacity for providing safety and security, we made a decision some time ago that we would not approve demonstration applications for the dates of October 12-14, 2017.ā€

The last line of Apgarā€™s denial indicates that RPI didnā€™t so much reject the request, because it would not have even been considered: RPIā€™s administration had long since decided that no demonstrations would be permitted during the entirety of homecoming weekend.

RPI isnā€™t a public institution, but it does make to its students that they enjoy freedom of speech and assembly. Those promises arenā€™t suspended or revocable on certain weekends, or when it might embarrass administrators in front of alumni and donors.

Itā€™s also true that a university could limit the time and place of a large demonstration during homecoming. But time, place, and manner restrictions have to be reasonable, and leave open the ability for demonstrators to get their message across to a relevant audience. In deciding in advance that all demonstrations, no matter their size or location, would be off-limits during homecoming, RPI is monopolizing all of its resources to the benefit of the administrationā€™s message, while shutting out the studentsā€™ message entirely. And, as the students , RPI has a history of utilizing outside security firms when its own resources are stretched thin.

The administrationā€™s prohibition on any demonstration is both contrary to RPIā€™s promises of freedom of expression, because it suggests viewpoint discrimination, and likely to only further alienate the administration from its students ā€” who are likely to defy the denial anyway.

Thatā€™s why we wrote to RPI this morning, calling on the administration to rescind its denial and work with students to ensure that their voices have a home this year:

We hope the administration will reverse course and allow the demonstration, and we will keep you posted on any developments.

Recent Articles

FIREā€™s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share