果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

Amy Wax is academic freedom's canary in the coal mine

Penn's chilling decision to punish the controversial professor calls tenure protections at private universities into question.
Penn professor Amy Wax with red tape over her mouth

Yesterday, the University of Pennsylvania completed its years-long end run around academic freedom to punish law professor Amy Wax. 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 working hard to ensure Penn鈥檚 dubious tactics won鈥檛 become the new playbook for private universities, which, unlike public universities, are not bound by the First Amendment.

Long under pressure to 鈥渄o something鈥 about the controversial Wax 鈥 who鈥檚 been widely criticized for her views on race and gender 鈥 Penn finally got its woman yesterday. 

After conducting a nearly two-year investigation of Wax, which extended more than a year since the last real hearing in her case, Penn announced the professor would indeed be sanctioned for 鈥渦nprofessionalism.鈥 She鈥檒l keep her tenured faculty role and serve a one-year suspension at half-pay. She鈥檒l also keep her benefits, an important fact given that Wax has been fighting cancer while battling Penn administrators.

Regardless of whether you care for Amy Wax鈥檚 opinions, you should care what happens to her. 

Penn is a private school that nonetheless makes First Amendment-like promises to respect its students鈥 and faculty members鈥 right to free expression. Whether on a contractual or moral basis, Penn should have kept those promises. Instead, it abandoned principle for the sake of expediency.

While it remains to be seen whether Wax will keep her promise to sue Penn if she鈥檚 punished, I told  yesterday that the university鈥檚 decision 鈥渟hould send a chill down the spine of every faculty member, not just at Penn but at every private institution around the country.鈥

笔别苍苍鈥檚&苍产蝉辫;dubious procedural efforts 鈥 which stripped Wax  of many of the due process protections tenure affords 鈥 paid off. If that鈥檚 all it takes to sidestep tenure, the rights of even the most protected private college faculty are tenuous at best.

FIRE has long defended Wax, and we continue to do so for two reasons. First, because her comments are unquestionably protected by academic freedom. And second, because the same principles that protect her right to hold both her views and her job also protect faculty who represent a range of viewpoints around the country. 

In our hyper-polarized political moment, faculty increasingly find themselves called 鈥渦nprofessional鈥 for their views on Israel and Gaza. Or on race. Or gender. Or abortion, or immigration, or the police, or COVID-19, or politics more broadly. Often the only thing standing between the angry college administrator 鈥 or the disgruntled donor, or the social media mob, or the local legislator coming for that professor鈥檚 job 鈥 is the time-honored principle of academic freedom.

That鈥檚 why, regardless of whether you care for Amy Wax鈥檚 opinions, you should care what happens to her. If our colleges and universities are to achieve their missions as bastions of academic excellence, faculty like Wax must remain free to speak their minds.

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share