Table of Contents
Columbia University Ignores Objections to Thought Reform Amid Free Speech Controversy

NEW YORK, October 11, 2006鈥擳he Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (果冻传媒app官方) is calling on Teachers College鈥擟olumbia University鈥檚 graduate school of education鈥攖o abandon its ideological litmus tests for students. These policies are manifestly inconsistent with Teachers College鈥檚 written promises of free speech and academic freedom as well as with Columbia President Lee Bollinger鈥檚 recent statements on the importance of free expression at Columbia University.
, which represents the 鈥減hilosophy for teacher education at Teachers College,鈥 requires students to possess a 鈥渃ommitment to social justice.鈥 Moreover, students are expected to recognize that 鈥渟ocial inequalities are often produced and perpetuated through systematic discrimination and justified by societal ideology of merit, social mobility, and individual responsibility.鈥
鈥淭he freedom of the mind is perhaps our most essential liberty. Sadly, Teachers College鈥檚 policies include ideological requirements for future teachers,鈥 FIREPresident Greg Lukianoff said. 鈥淲hile social justice may sound nice, no two people define social justice in exactly the same way. This policy presents a serious problem for students who define it differently from the university.鈥
FIRE wrote to Columbia President Lee Bollinger and Teachers College President Susan Fuhrman on September 15, urging them to abandon the 鈥減olicy of assessing student commitment to controversial, politicized, and wholly personal concepts like 鈥榮ocial justice.鈥欌 FIREpointed out that 鈥渢he twentieth century well demonstrates that one man鈥檚 idea of 鈥榮ocial justice鈥 potentially is another man鈥檚 idea of totalitarian tyranny,鈥 and implored Teachers College to 鈥渓ive up to its public promises鈥 of freedom of thought and expression. FIREreceived no response to its letter.
鈥淎ccording to Teachers College, students who believe that merit, social mobility, and individual responsibility are positive values rather than the hallmarks of injustice are not cut out to be teachers,鈥 Lukianoff said. 鈥淪uch political litmus tests all but guarantee that students will be evaluated on their opinions rather than their abilities.鈥
Columbia鈥檚 silence on this matter comes at a time when Columbia has shown an embarrassing lack of respect for the rights of its students. It recently suspended its men鈥檚 ice hockey club for posting a flyer that some on campus found offensive, only backing off from that punishment after extensive negative publicity. It is also currently embroiled in a controversy over a melee that erupted at a College Republicans-sponsored lecture by Minutemen founder Jim Gilchrist.
At other colleges and universities, requirements of ideological conformity have led to specific incidents of viewpoint discrimination against teacher candidates with dissenting views. For example, at Washington State University (WSU), education student Ed Swan was threatened with dismissal from WSU鈥檚 College of Education because he expressed certain political beliefs, such as the idea that white privilege and male privilege do not exist. At the time, WSU required its education students to 鈥渆xhibit[ ] an understanding of the complexities of race, power, gender, class, sexual orientation and privilege in American society.鈥 In WSU鈥檚 estimation, Swan, as an outspoken conservative, did not possess the required understanding. FIREalso had to intervene at Rhode Island College, where the School of Social Work required a conservative master鈥檚 student to publicly advocate for 鈥減rogressive鈥 social changes if he wanted to continue pursuing a degree in social work policy. At Le Moyne College, a student was dismissed from the graduate education program for writing a paper in which he expressed his personal beliefs about the need for strong discipline in the classroom鈥攁 paper that received an A-.
鈥淓xcellent teachers hold a wide variety of political and social views,鈥 Lukianoff stated. 鈥淭eachers College should abandon its politically loaded evaluation criteria and focus on what matters: whether students have obtained the knowledge and skill sets necessary to teach.鈥
FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression, academic freedom, and rights of conscience at our nation鈥檚 colleges and universities.
CONTACT:
Greg Lukianoff, President, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; greg_lukianoff@thefire.org
Lee Bollinger, President, Columbia University: 212-854-9970; bollinger@columbia.edu
Susan Fuhrman, President, Teachers College: 212-678-3131; susanf@tc.columbia.edu
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

FIREand ACLU of TX: University of Texas must drop unconstitutional drag ban

George Mason University calls cops on student for article criticizing Trump

鈥業 hate freedom of opinion鈥 meme leads to sentencing in German court
