In re: Gender Queer; In re: A Court of Mist & Fury
Cases
Case Overview
- Other Amici: Woodhull Freedom Foundation
In May 2022, two Virginia politicians filed a petition in Virginia Beach Circuit Court seeking declarations that two books are legally obscene, which would prohibit bookstores from selling them. The books are two award-winning books, Maia Kobabe鈥檚 鈥淕ender Queer鈥 and Sarah J. Maas鈥 鈥淎 Court of Mist and Fury.鈥 The politicians鈥 request invoked a rarely-used state law that allows Virginians to sue books and to compel their publishers and authors to defend them in court. After a retired state judge found 鈥減robable cause鈥 that the works are 鈥渙bscene for unrestricted viewing by minors,鈥 the petitioners sought temporary restraining orders to bar commercial distribution of the book. But book banning has no place in a free society.
So FIREand the Woodhull Freedom Foundation argued, in a friend-of-the-court filing, that neither book comes close to constituting obscenity as defined for minors under longstanding state and federal precedent. The books 鈥渨ill not appeal to or have value to every audience,鈥 the brief recognized, but the First Amendment only requires that the books have 鈥渧alue to an audience鈥 鈥 and both plainly do. In August 2022, the Circuit Court rejected the petitions.