DePaul University: Discrimination against Student Organization
Cases
DePaul University
Case Overview
In Spring 2010, the student group FIREfor Cannabis Policy Reform submitted an application for formal recognition at DePaul. On September 15, 2010, After holding up SCPR鈥檚 application for several months, Director of Student Life Suzanne Kilgannon rejected the group鈥檚 application, stating that recognizing the group 鈥渨ould send an institutional message that [Vice President for Student Affairs James R. Doyle] believes we are not prepared to manage.鈥 This denial clearly violated DePaul鈥檚 promises of freedom of speech and association. After FIREwrote to DePaul President Dennis Holtschneider on September 30, Doyle defended DePaul鈥檚 discrimination against SCPR by stating that recognized student groups must 鈥渂e congruent with our institutional goals regarding the health and well-being of our students鈥 and that 鈥淸c]onsiderable research indicates that the use of cannabis does not contribute to healthy decision-making, particularly in college-age populations.鈥 DePaul failed even to respond to 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 second letter, which pointed out the deficiencies in DePaul鈥檚 reasoning.