Table of Contents
Zoom announces much-needed protections for academic freedom, but new policy already faces a test
The past year鈥檚 shift to online education introduced a number of new challenges to the campus experience, including with regards to academic freedom in the virtual classroom. Zoom, a top choice for many universities conducting online education, played a central role in many of these challenges.
FIRE is glad to see Zoom acknowledge the need for academic freedom protections in the virtual classroom. Now we鈥檒l be watching to see if Zoom can actually abide by its policy.
But a new statement from Zoom that the service is beginning to take more seriously the pivotal role it plays in online education and academic freedom.
Concerns about Zoom鈥檚 use in the classroom have plagued universities in the United States and overseas since last spring. In June, reports emerged alleging that Zoom closed accounts located outside of China because they hosted events commemorating victims of the Tiananmen Square Massacre. Months later, a unsealed by federal prosecutors accused a China-based Zoom executive of working at the behest of Chinese government officials to shut down the accounts of at least four users outside China.
Concerns from FIREand others intensified in September, when Zoom two San Francisco State University faculty members the ability to host a discussion with Leila Khaled on its service after the event prompted complaints and cancellation demands. Khaled is most well-known for being the first woman to hijack an airplane, which she did in support of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a group deemed a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. Department of State.
Citing anti-terrorism laws, Zoom then events planned in response to the SFSU discussion at New York University, the University of Hawaii at Manoa, and the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. (As 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 Adam Steinbaugh explained at the time, the claims that hosting an online discussion with Khaled is material support of terrorism, and thus unlawful under federal law, are hard to support.)
Joining FIREand , faculty bodies at universities including Georgetown University and the University of California recently began calling for a re-evaluation of Zoom鈥檚 classroom use. Georgetown鈥檚 Main Campus Executive Faculty, for example, overwhelmingly passed a motion late last year calling on the university to 鈥淸d]evelop and publicize alternatives to Zoom so that it no longer enjoys a monopoly as [the] on-line classroom platform and meeting platform at Georgetown.鈥
Zoom appears to be listening. University of California, Los Angeles law professor and Volokh Conspiracy blogger Eugene Volokh earlier this week that Zoom had shared a new policy on academic freedom and called it a 鈥渟ubstantial improvement.鈥
In the policy, 鈥,鈥 Zoom states, 鈥渨e owe it to our higher education users to align our approach to speech and conduct as best we can with those of the academic institutions we serve.鈥 Zoom also notes that the company took 鈥渟pecial guidance鈥 from the American Association of University Professors鈥 . Zoom鈥檚 policy goes on to state:
This comment is for any higher education institution that has academic freedom policies substantially similar to the AAUP鈥檚 inside the classroom, or policies protecting speech on campus that are similar to the rules governing U.S. public universities.
For Zoom meetings and webinars hosted by a higher education institution, the Trust and Safety team will only act on reports alleging content-related violations of our Community Standards or Terms of Service that come from the meeting鈥檚 host or the account鈥檚 owners or administrators, unless:
- Zoom determines that there is legal or regulatory risk to Zoom if it does not act;
- the report alleges an immediate threat to the physical safety of any person; or
- the meeting or webinar is unrelated to the institution鈥檚 academics or operations.
Zoom will make best efforts to consult with the higher education institution as soon as is reasonably possible before acting on any complaints about violations of Zoom鈥檚 Community Standards or Terms of Service. On occasion, Zoom may require the higher education institution to put in writing that a particular meeting is related to the institution鈥檚 academics or operations, that the institution agrees to the meeting being hosted in its account, and that the meeting meets the institution鈥檚 standards for events on campus and online.
This policy is an improvement. Given that classroom discussions or academic events might venture into territory 鈥 like images of nudity in a film course or discussions of violence or hateful language in a law class 鈥 that would potentially be monitored on Zoom or another online platform, it鈥檚 important that Zoom ensure college classrooms are not subject to the whims of third-party content moderation. Additionally, by only acting on allegations of content violations that originate from meeting hosts or account holders (aside from the listed stipulations), Zoom should hopefully decrease the incentive for groups or individuals seeking to use the service鈥檚 moderation policies to censor controversial online academic events or classes.
FIRE is glad to see Zoom acknowledge the need for academic freedom protections in the virtual classroom. Now we鈥檒l be watching to see if Zoom can actually abide by its policy. We might not need to wait long 鈥 on April 23, the San Francisco State University鈥檚 Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diaspora Studies program and the University of California Humanities Research Institute will again attempt to for an event titled, 鈥淲hose Narratives? What Free Speech for Palestine?鈥
Zoom鈥檚 new statement did not fully address the grounds on which previous meetings with Khaled were censored 鈥 that the events were allegedly providing material support of terrorism 鈥 and the policy does confirm it will still act to censor events if the company 鈥渄etermines that there is legal or regulatory risk.鈥
Accordingly, it remains unclear how the company will handle new events with Khaled, but there is pressure from the for Zoom to shut down the April 23 event and some action may have already been taken. The Jerusalem Post that the page for the event 鈥渨as removed from Eventbrite at some point between Thursday and Friday,鈥 but the Zoom registration page remains available. Will that last? Either way, we should soon get answers about the extent of Zoom鈥檚 new policy on academic freedom.
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.