Table of Contents
Wesleyan University ends consideration of joint venture with Chinese partners
As of yesterday, Wesleyan University has its exploration into opening a joint venture campus in partnership with major Chinese corporation Hengdian Group and the Shanghai Theatre Academy.
The Wesleyan Argus that Wesleyan made the decision weeks after a number of students expressed a 鈥渓argely negative鈥 response, including a of about 70 students on Oct. 11 and a Wesleyan Student Assembly , passed unanimously with one abstention. The resolution voiced displeasure that 鈥淧resident Michael Roth and his cabinet did not intend to release any information about the potential Wesleyan Hengdian campus had the Wesleyan Argus not been informed about the plan.鈥
Earlier this month, Roth wrote in a blog that 鈥渃onversations about a possible campus in China are still in the very early stages鈥 and that 鈥淲esleyan has had a very positive history of working with students and faculty from China.鈥 However, he acknowledged that 鈥渢here are serious concerns about academic freedom and a host of related issues.鈥&苍产蝉辫;
The Argus that Roth made further comments expressing interest and trepidation at joint venture prospects in mid-October:
Nine days [after he published his blog post], Roth responded to a question about the potential joint venture in a presidential reception in Taipei, Taiwan.
鈥淭he question is: What if we had 3,000 students in China for Wesleyan?鈥 he said at the Oct. 20 event. 鈥淐ould we teach those students the way we teach those students in Middletown? That鈥檚 obviously a very tough question to answer positively, and if we can鈥檛 answer that question positively, we won鈥檛 do this project鈥. So we鈥檙e talking with them. I think it鈥檚 more likely that we won鈥檛 do it, for all the reasons you can imagine, but I think dismissal is something that we should avoid. Consideration is something we should pursue, and so we鈥檙e just considering this.鈥&苍产蝉辫;
Apparently Roth found an answer to his question. In his campus-wide email explaining the decision yesterday, he that 鈥渃onversations with those who proposed the partnership have made it clear that our respective goals could not be sufficiently aligned鈥攏ot to mention the questions we had around issues of academic freedom and the implications for our home campus.鈥
The issues Roth and the Wesleyan community recently grappled with 鈥 balancing the benefits of satellite campuses and joint ventures with the potential costs to student and faculty rights 鈥 have been flagged by FIREand campus rights advocates as serious concerns for years. As I at the New York Daily News last week in the wake of controversy over the NBA鈥檚 relationship with China, universities will continue to face challenges to their values as they embrace partnerships abroad, especially in countries with severe limits on expressive rights. Eventually, universities may be forced to choose between their principles and the potential for expansion.
It seems that Wesleyan leadership decided that the university鈥檚 values could not be guaranteed at a joint venture in China, and chose to stand by the former.
This is the decision universities should arrive at if they conclude that they cannot sustain core values of free expression and academic freedom in proposed partnerships 鈥 one that FIREencourages university leadership to make in our 鈥Commitment to Campus Free Expression at Home and Abroad.鈥&苍产蝉辫;
FIRE hopes other universities will similarly prioritize academic freedom in their current and future partnerships and refuse to put the rights of students and faculty up for negotiation.
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.