Table of Contents
Washington State University Bankrolls Vigilante Censorship
PULLMAN, Wash., July 18, 2005鈥擨n a shameful distortion of the First Amendment, Washington State University has morally and financially supported disruptive heckling and threats at a controversial student play.
Washington State went so far as to pay for hecklers to attend student playwright Chris Lee鈥檚 Passion of the Musical. It then allowed the hecklers to repeatedly disrupt the musical through shouts and threats of violence. Washington State鈥檚 president later defended the hecklers鈥 behavior as a 鈥渞esponsible鈥 exercise of free speech.
鈥淔IREhave a right to leave a play, protest outside of the theater, and condemn a play in the newspaper. But they do not have the right to obstruct and censor other students鈥 protected expression,鈥 remarked David French, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (果冻传媒app官方), which has intervened on Lee鈥檚 behalf. 鈥淲ashington State鈥檚 defense of this vigilante censorship will encourage students to unlawfully silence others whenever they feel offended.鈥
On April 21, 2005, Lee and his student cast performed the final production of Passion of the Musical, a play they had widely publicized as being potentially 鈥渙ffensive or inflammatory to all audiences.鈥 During the play, a group of 40 student protestors repeatedly stood up, shouted about being offended, and verbally threatened audience members and the cast. FIREhas obtained a document confirming that administrators at Washington State鈥檚 Office for Campus Involvement (OCI) purchased the hecklers鈥 tickets.
The disruptions were so severe that at one point, Lee requested that campus security remove the hecklers from the audience. Campus security refused, instead asking Lee (who is African American) to censor part of his production by changing the word 鈥渂lack鈥 to 鈥渂lank鈥 in the satirical song 鈥淚 Will Do Anything for God, But I Won鈥檛 Act Black鈥 in order 鈥渢o avoid a possible riot or physical harm.鈥
Lee later complained of this censorship to Washington State鈥檚 Center for Human Rights (CHR) and other administrators. CHR鈥檚 May 13 report justified the disruptions as protected expression, claiming that because the play provoked and 鈥渢aunted鈥 the audience, it exhibited 鈥渜ualities of a public forum.鈥 Washington State President V. Lane Rawlins was quoted in the campus paper as saying that the protestors 鈥渆xercised their rights of free speech in a very responsible manner by letting the writer and players know exactly how they felt.鈥
鈥淲ashington State鈥檚 鈥榩ublic forum鈥 excuse is so ridiculous I don鈥檛 think even they believe it,鈥 commented Greg Lukianoff, 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 director of legal and public advocacy. 鈥淒oes this mean that any time a play addresses the audience, it becomes a public forum? Under this theory, every soliloquy in Shakespeare would turn a theater into a discussion hall. Everyone knows what a play is鈥攁nd that the audience does not have the right to disrupt it or to threaten the cast.鈥
Interestingly, the same office that bankrolled the hecklers at Passion of the Musical . Washington State also played host in April to Tales of the Lost Formicans, in which a cast member simulated masturbating into the American flag. Washington State called that play 鈥渁 whimsical look at the idiosyncrasies of human interaction鈥 and .
鈥淐learly, Washington State does not treat equally all plays that some might find offensive,鈥 Lukianoff observed.
On June 17, FIRE wrote President Rawlins to request that Washington State renounce its support of a 鈥渉eckler鈥檚 veto鈥 over constitutionally protected expression. President Rawlins鈥 June 20 response to 果冻传媒app官方 was a non-answer in which Rawlins claimed that the university was 鈥渃ommitted to everyone鈥檚 exercise of all their human rights at WSU, including free speech, without fear of unlawful obstruction by anyone.鈥
FIRE reiterated its request on July 1, reminding Rawlins that 鈥淲ashington State is a public university bound by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and therefore may not tolerate, let alone support, attempts to disrupt, silence, and censor a theatrical work.鈥 On July 14, that Rawlins responded to FIREwithout withdrawing his support for the hecklers, but FIREas yet has received no such response.
鈥淎s Lee said in a recent article, 鈥楾he whole point [of the play] was to show people we鈥檙e not that different, we all have issues that can be made fun of,鈥欌 noted Lukianoff. 鈥淭he very function of satire and parody is to challenge, provoke, and, yes, offend. If Washington State is not comfortable with this, it is not comfortable with the idea of free speech.鈥
FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression, academic freedom, and rights of conscience at our nation鈥檚 colleges and universities. 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 efforts to preserve liberty on campuses across America can be viewed at thefire.org.
CONTACT:
David French, President, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; david@thefire.org
Greg Lukianoff, Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; greg@thefire.org
V. Lane Rawlins, President, Washington State University: 509-335-6666; rawlins@wsu.edu
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Maine鈥檚 censure of lawmaker for post about trans student-athlete is an attack on free speech

Trump鈥檚 border czar is wrong about AOC

FIREcalls out 60 Minutes investigation as 'political stunt' in comment to FCC
