������ýapp�ٷ�

WINSTON-SALEM, N.C., April 4, 2019 — Does Wake Forest University know that, historically, witch hunts haven’t gone well in places named Salem?

Based on the Winston-Salem school’s decision to a parody Instagram post, they do not — and now a controversy is brewing. Today, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education is calling on Wake Forest to drop its sham investigation.

A March 22 Instagram story from a now-deleted account showed a hypothetical student government candidate (who is a real student, but isn’t running for office and didn’t know about the post) campaigning to “build a wall” between Wake Forest and nearby Winston-Salem State University. After circulating on social media, many commenters suggested the post was racist because Winston-Salem State is a historically black institution.

Wake Forest President Nathan Hatch the following day that a team led by the dean of students was investigating the issue.

“While the intent of the authors may have been a parody of a national issue, it was deeply offensive and unacceptable,” Hatch wrote.

Wake Forest cannot stand by its commitments to free expression while launching investigations into speech that, while some students might find offensive, remains protected speech.

“Parodies and jokes may be ‘deeply offensive,’ but they’re within the scope of speech Wake Forest promises to respect,” said Adam Goldstein, program officer of ������ýapp�ٷ�’s Individual Rights Defense Program. “Wake Forest’s witch hunt to find the anonymous author of a parody meme is a waste of time, a waste of money, and undermines Wake Forest’s aspirations as an academic community.”

TAKE ACTION: TELL WAKE FOREST TO DROP ITS SHAM INVESTIGATION

FIRE wrote to Wake Forest on March 28, urging administrators to drop the sham investigation. The university has not yet responded.

Though Wake Forest is a private institution and not bound by the First Amendment, it explicitly promises free speech. According to , “[t]he University is committed to providing all students the right to openly dissent and to speak, write, listen, challenge, protest, and learn. Though the vibrant exchange of ideas may become contentious, such interactions, as part of the University’s educational mission, can lead to changed perspectives, advanced knowledge, and informed action.”

While Wake Forest is free to condemn jokes it finds in poor taste, it cannot mount investigations into student expression that the university purports to protect.

Wake Forest earns ������ýapp�ٷ�’s worst rating for free speech in our Spotlight on Speech Codes 2019 report. Schools with the worst, “red light” rating maintain written policies that “clearly and substantially” restrict free speech. Elsewhere in the state, North Carolina institutions are leaders in protecting free speech. The Tar Heel State is home to 11 institutions with ������ýapp�ٷ�’s highest, “green light” rating — more than any other state in the country.

“What, exactly, does Wake Forest hope to achieve by ‘investigating’ the author of a post that’s deleted with content that nobody thinks is real?” Goldstein asked. “Does the university wish to go online and announce that, after a thorough investigation, it determined the post was totally unfunny?”

We at FIREare not amused that Wake Forest has violated its promises to its students, and we’ll continue working to ensure the university lives up to its professed promises of free speech.

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of students and faculty members at America’s colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience — the essential qualities of liberty.

CONTACT:

Daniel Burnett, Assistant Director of Communications, ������ýapp�ٷ�: 215-717-3473; media@thefire.org

Ask Wake Forest to drop this wasteful investigation