Table of Contents
VICTORY: Michigan city recognizes First Amendment right to ādemeanā government officials
![Wide angle close up of City Hall sign in Downtown Bay City, Michigan. The sign is in the foreground with the City Hall clock tower in the background.](/sites/default/files/styles/379x213/public/2023/06/City%20Hall%20sign%20in%20Downtown%20Bay%20City%20Michigan%20-%20CREDIT%20Jake%20M.%20Media%20Shutterstock.jpg.webp?itok=AhctWcmJ)
Jake M. Media / Shutterstock.com
Citizens of Bay City are now able to speak freely at city commission meetings ā even when they talk about city officials or employees in ways the commission might not like.
Last summer, ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½ wrote the city explaining that its code provisions prohibiting certain categories of speech during public comment periods of commission meetings were unconstitutional. That code prohibited public speakers from ādemeaning city officials, officers, or employees,ā making ā[d]erogatory comments directed at another person,ā or āusing vulgarities.ā
But, as we explained to the city, the First Amendment bars public officials from banning speech because they find it offensive or otherwise objectionable. The Supreme Court has ruled that broadly prohibiting all disparaging comments is impermissible viewpoint-based censorship. As we said in our initial letter to the city commission:
It is all too easy to envision the Commission enforcing the rules to suppress criticism of commissioners and other city officials while giving the public free rein to praise the city and its leaders. FIREhas seen it happen before. This double standard contravenes the First Amendment and our countryās āprofound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.ā
Nor can the city simply ban all āvulgarities,ā regardless of context. Under the former policy, citizens could not even use vulgar language that might be relevant to their comments, such as quoting a vulgarity mentioned in a newspaper or uttered by a government official.
FIRE also explained to the Bay City Commission that its rules were unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, leaving commenters to guess what comments could get them cut off from speaking or ejected from meetings. It also allows city commissioners to subjectively and arbitrarily interpret the rules.
Now, the city has heeded ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½ās call to amend its policies to comply with the First Amendment. In December, the commission amended meeting rules that remove the bans on public comments that are āderogatory,ā āvulgar,ā or ādemeaningā to city officials or employees.
FIRE commends the Bay City Commission for aligning its meeting comment policies with the Constitution. Cities and counties around the country would be wise to review their own comment policies to ensure the same alignment.
Recent Articles
FIREās award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
![Pro-Trump protester in New York holding sign that reads: "Defund the Media" and has logos of ABC, NPR, and other news outlets.](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2025/02/Pro-Trump%20protester%20in%20New%20York%20holding%20sign%20that%20reads%20Defund%20the%20Media%20-%20Ben%20Von%20Klemperer.jpg.webp?itok=Qu8xJStr)
Media outlets must not cave to Trumpās lawfare
![Student movement protest poster during student Israeli Palestinian conflict demonstrations at Harvard University](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2025/02/Student%20movement%20protest%20poster%20during%20student%20Israeli%20Palestinian%20conflict%20demonstrations%20at%20Harvard%20University.jpg.webp?itok=6FUEvzPy)
Analysis: Harvardās settlement adopting IHRA anti-Semitism definition a prescription to chill campus speech
![George Washington University Police officers tussle with protesters who tried to raise the Palestinian flag on the campus flagpole](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2024/06/George%20Washington%20University%20Police%20tussle%20with%20protesters%20who%20tried%20to%20raise%20the%20Palestinian%20flag%20on%20the%20campus%20flagpole.jpg.webp?itok=f97Fo82m)
Trumpās threat to deport anti-Israel protesters is an attack on free speech
![Image of scales of justice cropped alongside another image of students in college](/sites/default/files/styles/334x250/public/2025/01/Title%20IX%20scales%20of%20justice%20students%20in%20college.png.webp?itok=vU81y6VO)