果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

Utah enacts law ensuring campus anti-harassment policies respect First Amendment rights

Capitol of Utah

(Nagel Photography / Shutterstock)

SALT LAKE CITY, Utah, Mar. 17, 2021鈥 On Tuesday, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox signed , which codifies into state law the speech-protective definition of student-on-student harassment set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education. The bill was sponsored by Rep. Jordan Teuscher and Sen. Todd Weiler and earned bipartisan support in the House while passing the Senate unanimously.

The bill enacts language directly taken from the Davis opinion, defining student-on-student harassment as expression that 鈥渋s so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive, and that so undermines and distracts from a student鈥檚 educational experience, that the student is effectively denied access to an institution鈥檚 resource or opportunity.鈥

鈥淧ublic institutions of higher education have a legal and moral responsibility to end discriminatory student-on-student harassment and to abide by the First Amendment,鈥 said Joe Cohn, legislative and policy director at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, a campus civil liberties organization. 鈥淏y adopting the framework provided by the Supreme Court of the United States, Utah has made sure its public colleges and universities will meet those twin obligations.鈥

FIRE sees no shortage of cases when students鈥 First Amendment rights are trampled by overbroad harassment policies. It has long been a champion of the Davis standard as both the optimal, and constitutionally-required, standard for determining when student expression crosses the line into unprotected harassment. 

As FIREwrote in its Spotlight on Speech Codes 2021 report, 鈥淸C]olleges and universities often fail to limit themselves to the narrow definition of harassment that is outside the realm of constitutional protection. Instead, they expand the term to prohibit broad categories of speech that do not even approach actionable harassment, despite similar policies having been struck down by federal courts years earlier.鈥

HB 159鈥檚 success is the result of years of FIREadvocacy and negotiation in the state to ensure that student rights are protected and constitutional obligations are fulfilled. 

With HB 159鈥檚 passage, Utah joins Alabama, Arkansas, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Tennessee as the sixth state to require colleges and universities to align their anti-harassment policies with First Amendment jurisprudence. Regulations promulgated by the federal government in 2020 also adopted the Davis standard to govern Title IX cases.

As has already been the case with dozens of institutions across the country, FIREstands ready to assist Utah colleges as they revise their policies in light of the law鈥檚 requirements. This work is performed free of charge to institutions or taxpayers, in accordance with 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 charitable mission.

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (果冻传媒app官方) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of students and faculty members at America鈥檚 colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience 鈥 the essential qualities of liberty.

CONTACT:

Katie Kortepeter, Media Relations Associate, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; media@thefire.org

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share