果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

U. of Tulsa Suspends Student for Someone Else鈥檚 Facebook Post

TULSA, Okla., February 12, 2015鈥擨n a triple blow to free speech, due process, and freedom of the press, the University of Tulsa (TU) arbitrarily banned a student from campus until 2016 for Facebook posts that someone else admitted to writing and then attempted to intimidate student journalists who were trying to cover the story.

鈥淭he University of Tulsa鈥檚 speech police are putting in some serious overtime on this case,鈥 said Peter Bonilla, Director of the Individual Rights Defense Program at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (果冻传媒app官方). 鈥淧unishing someone for the speech of a friend or relative might be par for the course in a dictatorship, but it has no place on our nation鈥檚 college campuses. Worse, TU wants to hide how it鈥檚 ignoring its own rules from the oversight of campus courts or the student press.鈥

TU suspended student George 鈥淭rey鈥 Barnett last October for three Facebook posts published by his husband that criticized another student and two TU faculty members. None of the Facebook posts came from Barnett鈥檚 account; the statements were posted by his husband, who either tagged Barnett or posted them directly to Barnett鈥檚 Facebook page. Barnett鈥檚 husband later submitted a sworn affidavit attesting to his sole authorship of the posts. Nevertheless, shortly after TU professor Susan Barrett filed a complaint against Barnett arguing that Barnett could not 鈥渁void responsibility鈥 because someone else was responsible for the posts, TU Senior Vice Provost Winona Tanaka imposed eight restrictive interim measures against Barnett. The sanctions included suspending his participation in certain courses and activities and even barring him from speaking about certain individuals.

Without affording him the hearing he was entitled to under TU鈥檚 , and despite his husband鈥檚 affidavit, Tanaka found Barnett responsible for 鈥渉arassment.鈥 Tanaka also found Barnett guilty of retaliation and violating confidentiality requirements for speaking about the disciplinary charges with his husband鈥攚ho was also his exculpatory witness.

Less than two months before Barnett was set to graduate, Tanaka not only suspended him until at least 2016 but also permanently banned him from receiving a degree in his major even upon his re-enrollment. Barnett was forced to wait two months for TU to respond to his appeal, which the university summarily denied on January 9 without explanation鈥攍eaving Barnett unable to earn his theater degree as planned.

FIRE wrote to TU in October, explaining that holding Barnett responsible for a third party鈥檚 actions violated basic principles of fairness and due process, that the misapplication of TU鈥檚 harassment policies violated its promises of freedom of expression to its students, and that it is unconscionable to punish a student for discussing charges against him with a third party. TU did not respond to 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 letter.

TU has also threatened the expressive rights of the staff of its independent student newspaper, The Collegian, which this week reported on Barnett鈥檚 suspension and criticized his treatment. The Collegian reports that after contacting TU administrators for comment, student reporters were told by TU鈥檚 director of marketing and communications that if 鈥渁nything that the university deems to be confidential鈥 is 鈥減ublished or shared, (that) could violate university policies.鈥 The university refused to explain what might constitute 鈥渃onfidential鈥 information and, come press time, the journalists were unsure what action the university might take against them.

鈥淭U students are right to be concerned about their free speech and due process rights, given the university鈥檚 sheer vindictiveness in banishing Barnett and its treatment of their student newspaper,鈥 said Bonilla. 鈥We鈥檝e warned TU about its dangerously overbroad harassment policy before, yet it continues to fly in the face of its promise that students retain 鈥榯he rights and privileges granted to all citizens in the Bill of Rights.鈥 The university needs to be held accountable for breaking that promise.鈥

FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, freedom of expression, academic freedom, due process, and rights of conscience at our nation鈥檚 colleges and universities. 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 efforts to preserve liberty on campuses across America can be viewed at .

CONTACT:

Nico Perrino, Associate Director of Communications, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; nico@thefire.org

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share