果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

Tyranny at Tufts

BOSTON, May 11, 2007鈥擲howing profound disregard for free speech and freedom of the press, Tufts University has found a conservative student publication guilty of harassment and creating a hostile environment for publishing political satire. Despite explicitly promising to protect controversial and offensive expression in its policies, the Tufts Committee on Student Life decided yesterday to punish the student publication The Primary Source (TPS) for printing two articles that offended African-American and Muslim students on campus. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (果冻传媒app官方), which has spearheaded the defense of TPS, is now launching a public campaign to oppose Tufts鈥 outrageous actions.

鈥淲e now know that Tufts鈥 promises of free expression are hollow,鈥 FIREPresident Greg Lukianoff said. 鈥淏y punishing political expression鈥攖he type of expression at the very core of the right to free speech鈥擳ufts has shown that, in spite of its promises, it has no regard for its students鈥 fundamental rights. Such hypocrisy must not go unchallenged.鈥

Last December, TPS published a satirical Christmas carol entitled 鈥淥h Come All Ye Black Folk.鈥 Although TPS runs a Christmas carol parody every year, December鈥檚 carol sparked controversy on campus because it harshly lampooned race-based admissions. Realizing that the carol offended large portions of the Tufts community, TPS published an apology on December 6, 2006. Four months later, however, a student filed charges alleging that the carol constituted 鈥渉arassment鈥 and created a 鈥渉ostile environment.鈥 Other students filed similar charges in response to TPS鈥 April 11, 2007 piece entitled 鈥淚slam鈥擜rabic Translation: Submission,鈥 a satirical advertisement that ridiculed Tufts鈥 鈥淚slamic Awareness Week鈥 by highlighting militant Islamic terrorism.

The two complaints were consolidated for a hearing before the university鈥檚 Committee on Student Life on April 30, 2007. Yesterday, the Committee issued a decision holding that TPS had violated the university鈥檚 harassment policy by publishing the two pieces. The Committee found that the carol 鈥渢argeted [black students] on the basis of their race, subjected them to ridicule and embarrassment, intimidated them, and had a deleterious impact on their growth and well-being on campus.鈥 The Committee also held that the parody of Islamic Awareness Week 鈥渢argeted members of the Tufts Muslim community for harassment and embarrassment, and that Muslim students felt psychologically intimidated by the piece.鈥

鈥淏y issuing this decision, Tufts University is saying that its students are not strong enough to live with freedom,鈥 Lukianoff said. 鈥淪atire and parody are so strongly protected by the U.S. Constitution precisely because they may offend or provoke. Tufts knows that the proper cure for speech one dislikes is more speech鈥攂ut it has instead elected to meet controversial speech with repression. We call on the president of Tufts to overturn this unwise and illiberal decision.鈥

FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process rights, freedom of expression, and rights of conscience on our campuses. 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 efforts to preserve liberty at Tufts University and elsewhere can be seen by visiting www.thefire.org.

CONTACT:
Greg Lukianoff, President, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; greg_lukianoff@thefire.org

Lawrence S. Bacow, President, Tufts University: 617-627-3300; bacow@tufts.edu

Barbara Grossman, Chair, Committee on Student Life: 617-627-2535; barbara.grossman@tufts.edu

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share