Table of Contents
Reminder to Gettysburg College: Revise Your Policy
On November 3, 2006, FIREsent a follow-up letter to Gettysburg College in Pennsylvania encouraging the school to keep its promise to rewrite its Sexual Misconduct Policy as stated in a mass e-mail sent to the student body on October 29, 2006. FIREpointed out that the primary problem with the policy was its extraordinary overbreadth, noting that 鈥淸t]he current policy makes almost every member of the campus community a sexual offender鈥(it) places acts of true sexual assault in the same group as innocuous everyday acts, such as hugs without permission.鈥
The exact wording of the offending part of the policy is this:
All sexual interaction between any two people must be consensual. Each individual has a responsibility to obtain consent before engaging in sexual interaction. Consent is defined as the act of willingly and verbally agreeing (for example, by stating 鈥測es鈥) to engage in specific sexual conduct. If either person at any point in a sexual encounter does not give continuing and active consent, all sexual contact must cease, even if consent was given earlier.
That鈥檚 right鈥斺渃ontinuing and active consent鈥濃攚hatever that means. The policy further defines 鈥渟exual interaction鈥 as 鈥渂rushing, touching, grabbing, pinching, patting, hugging, and kissing.鈥 In other words, by the very terms of the policy, husbands would have to ask permission to kiss their wives, boyfriends would have to ask permission to hug their girlfriends, and friends would have to ask permission to give an amiable pat on the back. And remember, failure to do so was deemed to be a form of 鈥渟exual assault.鈥
FIRE first wrote to Gettysburg on April 11, 2006, objecting to the policy, which 鈥渄angerously trivializes sexual assault by equating heinous acts with innocent behaviors.鈥 Unfortunately, Gettysburg president Katherine Haley chose to defend the policy in a letter to FIREon April 27, 2006, arguing that somehow it 鈥渞eflect(ed) good practice.鈥 Only after FIREissued a press release on May 11, 2006, exposing the absurdity of Gettysburg鈥檚 policy to the public, and after writing another letter to the school on August 17, did Gettysburg state that it would be revisiting the policy this year鈥攑roving once again that 鈥渟unlight is the best disinfectant.鈥
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.
Five scary threats to free speech
Election season and Halloween conjure up frightening threats to free expression. Here are five that FIREis monitoring this year.
Let the uninhibited debate begin! 鈥 Lukianoff v. Franks? 鈥 First Amendment News 445
George Washington Law professor Mary Anne Franks is ready to take on some noted First Amendment advocates, including 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 own CEO Greg Lukianoff.
The First Amendment protects your right to trick or treat
Don鈥檛 be a free speech ogre on Halloween. Dressing up in costumes and asking for candy are constitutionally protected forms of free expression.
Minnesota state agency must drop investigation of employee鈥檚 Facebook post
Political pressure is mounting on the Minnesota Department of Resources to fire Tyler Janke for his post about the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump in July.