¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½

Table of Contents

Northwestern Risks Academic Freedom (Again) by Censoring Bioethics Journal with ā€˜Bad Girlsā€™ Theme

CHICAGO, June 16, 2015ā€”Academic freedom is apparently no longer a part of Northwestern Universityā€™s ā€œbrand.ā€ For over 14 months, administrators at Northwesternā€™s Feinberg School of Medicine (FSM) censored ā€”a faculty-produced bioethics journalā€”because an issue featured content with a ā€œBad Girlsā€ theme deemed too salacious for the universityā€™s image. Northwestern is now requiring that future journal content be reviewed by university administrators prior to its publication.

This is the second time in less than a month that Northwestern finds itself at the center of an academic freedom controversy over issues of sex and gender. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) wrote to Northwestern on May 26, calling on the university to honor its and cease its repeated intrusions on Atriumā€™s editorial independence. The university has yet to respond.

ā€œThe ability to explore controversial subjects lies at the heart of academic freedom,ā€ said Peter Bonilla, Director of ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½ā€™s Individual Rights Defense Program. ā€œNorthwestern cannot ā€˜full freedom in research and in the publication of the resultsā€™ while limiting that freedom to protect its ā€˜brand.ā€™ A universityā€™s brand should be the unfettered search for truth, not politically motivated censorship.ā€

Atriumā€™s fight for free expression goes back more than a year to the publication of its  in February 2014. The issue featured a ā€œBad Girlsā€ theme and was guest-edited by FSM Professor of Clinical Medical Humanities and Bioethics Alice Dreger. Featuring contributions from a variety of scholars from across the country, the issue included an essay by Syracuse University Professor William J. Peace about his rehabilitation after being paralyzed in 1978 at the age of 18. , titled ā€œHead Nurses,ā€ Peace describes his experience of receiving consensual oral sex from a nurse, an episode that eased fears he had lost his ability to function sexually. Peace credited the nurse, whom he remained friends with throughout her lifetime, with aiding his psychological recovery.

Northwestern officials were reportedly concerned about the ā€œBad Girlsā€ issue, and Peaceā€™s article in particular, worrying that it would hurt the ā€œbrandā€ of FSM and Northwestern Medicine, the corporate parent overseeing the universityā€™s hospital system. Under pressure from the university, the Medical Humanities & Bioethics Program (MHB Program, which publishes Atrium) removed the ā€œBad Girlsā€ issue, as well as all previously published Atrium issues, from its website.

It was not until May 18, 2015ā€”14 months after the ā€œBad Girlsā€ issue was removed from its websiteā€”that Northwestern officials withdrew their objections to the issueā€™s posting. This reversal came only a day after Dreger informed the university that she intended to publicize the controversy.

Though , its most serious struggles may be yet to come. Dreger reports that Northwestern has formed a new oversight committee tasked with reviewing the content of Atriumā€™s next issue. This is a significant departure from the publicationā€™s past editorial practice, giving rise to concerns that the university will take an active role in policing the publicationā€™s content.

ā€œThrough this censorship my deanā€™s office put me in the position of either staying silent and being a hypocrite or calling out my own dean on censorship,ā€ said Dreger, who on academic freedom and the struggle for truth and justice in the sciences. ā€œI told our university public relations people, the deanā€™s office, and ultimately our provost that I resented being put in this position, particularly when the censorship was so unnecessary and capricious.ā€

Northwestern has already been the subject of intense scrutiny in recent weeks. On May 29, Professor Laura Kipnis revealed that she endured a 72-day university investigation following multiple Title IX complaints over she published in The Chronicle of Higher Education.

ā€œGiven the negative publicity Northwestern has suffered for subjecting Kipnisā€™s free expression to a chilling and prolonged investigation, we would hope that Northwestern would promptly get in front of this controversy and affirm its support of Atrium and the MHB Programā€™s rights,ā€ said Bonilla. ā€œThat it hasnā€™t yet done so suggests Northwestern may have even more work to do to be truly protective of free expression than was previously thought.ā€

FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, freedom of expression, academic freedom, due process, and freedom of conscience at our nationā€™s colleges and universities. ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½ā€™s efforts to preserve liberty on campuses across America can be viewed at thefire.org.

CONTACT:

Nico Perrino, Associate Director of Communications, ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½: 215-717-3473; nico@thefire.org

Eric G. Neilson, Lewis Landsberg Dean and Vice President for Medical Affairs, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine: 312-503-0340; egneilson@northwestern.edu

Morton Schapiro, President, Northwestern University: 847-491-7456; nu-president@northwestern.edu

Recent Articles

FIREā€™s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share