Table of Contents
North Carolina State University Will No Longer Require Written Permission to Speak on Campus, Paying a Hefty Settlement

Last month, a federal court ordered North Carolina State University (NC State) to stop enforcing a policy that required student groups to get written permission from administrators before distributing literature or merely speaking to students on campus. While NC State repeatedly defended the policy鈥攁 policy squarely at odds with the First Amendment鈥攖he university has now agreed to settle a lawsuit brought by a student organization. As part of that settlement, NC State revised the policy and agreed to pay for the student group鈥檚 legal fees.
NC State鈥檚 prohibited 鈥渁ny distribution of leaflets, brochures or other written material, or oral speech to a passersby [sic]鈥 without written permission in advance from administrators. NC State student group Grace Christian Life, represented by attorneys from , called upon NC State to rescind the policy. When NC State repeatedly refused, Grace Christian Life sued, and a federal judge entered a preliminary injunction requiring the university to stop enforcing the policy pending trial. As FIREpredicted, NC State has now by finally agreeing to reform the policy and agreeing to pay $72,500 of Grace Christian Life鈥檚 attorneys鈥 fees.
The eliminates the requirement to obtain prior authorization, permitting students to demonstrate, speak, and pass out literature without a permission slip. That鈥檚 a welcome change. Exercising First Amendment rights does not require a permission slip from university administrators. NC State should have recognized that from the outset.
NC State could have written a coherent policy that didn鈥檛 violate the First Amendment. NC State could have revised its policy when Grace Christian Life鈥檚 attorneys from Alliance Defending Freedom first asked the institution to fix the policy. NC State could have revised its policy when it was sued, before attempting to defend the policy before a federal judge.
NC State chose to do none of those things. Now it will cost the citizens and students whose taxes and tuition pay the NC State administrators who should鈥檝e made those decisions. How much, exactly, is unknown. While NC State will pay $72,500 toward the student group鈥檚 legal fees, that amount doesn鈥檛 include the expenses incurred in employing government attorneys to defend the indefensible policy.
The Wilson Times that NC State鈥檚 acquiescence is a victory for all students, no matter their views:
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion. Those are broad categories that encompass a lot of expression, and government bodies like our public universities can鈥檛 slap arbitrary labels like 鈥渘on-commercial solicitation鈥 on speech in order to restrict it.
Call it witnessing, evangelism, conversation, conversion, soul-saving or 鈥渟olicitation鈥 鈥 it鈥檚 still free speech. Period.
A permit policy with such nebulous language could just as easily be used to shut down petition drives, political discussions and nearly any encounter between students where persuasion or invitation is involved. Since so many mundane exchanges could conceivably qualify as 鈥渟olicitation,鈥 we have no trouble believing the rule was enforced on a selective basis to suit individual administrators鈥 tastes.
Adult students on the campuses of our public colleges and universities enjoy the full exercise of their constitutional rights. School officials cannot lawfully limit them.
We believe N.C. State deserves some credit for recognizing the error of its ways and settling the case to avoid fighting a losing battle against the First Amendment. That praise, however, is tempered by the fact that NCSU has humiliated itself in its short-lived defense of the school rule and, as a condition of the settlement, will pay the plaintiffs鈥 $72,500 legal fees out of our collective pockets.
This is exactly right. Universities that enshrine policies impeding the First Amendment rights of their students will pay a price. When they institute speech-restrictive policies, the students bear the cost, paying tuition to attend a school where campus discourse is chilled. When schools like NC State resist calls to reform these policies, the taxpayers foot the bill, paying attorneys鈥 fees to defend the indefensible.
If you鈥檙e a student at any of the colleges and universities with speech-restrictive policies鈥攐r a taxpayer funding one of these institutions鈥攁sk your school or elected officials to reform their policies. Let them know that FIREis always willing to work with institutions on their policies in order to address First Amendment concerns.
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Maine鈥檚 censure of lawmaker for post about trans student-athlete is an attack on free speech

Trump鈥檚 border czar is wrong about AOC

FIREcalls out 60 Minutes investigation as 'political stunt' in comment to FCC
