Table of Contents
Marquette Harassment Training Forbids Certain Viewpoints
FIRE hopes readers are hungry for more news about problematic Title IX training courses, because professors and graduate assistants at Marquette University in Wisconsin are evidently that grossly misstates what kind of expression is acceptable in the university workplace.
and , a blog run by Marquette political science professor John McAdams, both have posted screen captures and information on the course, which is designed to inform staff, including faculty members, about sexual harassment and sexual violence. McAdams notes on his blog that the course starts off by stating that unlawful harassment must relate to a protected class, be unwelcome and objectively offensive, and be severe or pervasive. This formulation does a good job of tracking the law on hostile environment harassment in the workplace (which, importantly for students鈥 free speech rights, is distinct from the standard for hostile environment harassment between students).
But subsequent slides in the module indicate that even clearly protected speech鈥攕peech that is not objectively offensive, not unwelcome, or not related to protected classes鈥攎ay be considered 鈥渉arassment.鈥
Perhaps the most egregious example from the module is a slide about hypothetical peers Becky and Maria, who 鈥渉ave been talking about their .鈥 Hans overhears the conversations, is offended, and reports the two for harassment. Hans鈥檚 action is in the module.
Let鈥檚 take a step back for a moment to better appreciate the ridiculousness of this concept. Marquette University is a private school and therefore not legally bound by the First Amendment. However, Marquette鈥檚 advertised commitment to free expression in its student handbook is broad enough to suggest that all members of the community will enjoy unfettered discussion:
It is clearly inevitable, and indeed essential, that the spirit of inquiry and challenge that the university seeks to encourage will produce many conflicts of ideas, opinions and proposals for action.
Threatening punishment for a particular viewpoint on an issue of the day is hardly reflective of this statement.
Further, Marquette is a Catholic school. As McAdams points out, the module鈥檚 instructions mean that 鈥渕erely endorsing Church teaching in a university setting can be harassment.鈥
And opposition to gay marriage isn鈥檛 the only opinion that could get Marquette professors in trouble. McAdams also posted a slide addressing an one might hang in his or her office, which says, 鈥淔ollowing orders is no excuse,鈥 and depicts the word 鈥渨ar鈥 in a red circle with a slash through it. McAdams explains Marquette鈥檚 logic:
An anti-war poster is declared unfit because 鈥渆xtreme anti-war postings could contribute to an environment of harassment based on military or veteran status.鈥
If this poster is 鈥渆xtreme,鈥 what isn鈥檛? Would it be acceptable if presented in the context of condemning Nazi soldiers? And to echo a point McAdams makes, are we to believe that military veterans cannot handle six words on a poster?
Professors who complete the module鈥攖heoretically, all of them鈥攁nd take its lessons to heart will likely opt not to participate in discussion on a wide range of topics in order to avoid punishment for 鈥渉arassment.鈥 This chilling effect on faculty speech is unacceptable at an institution that claims to foster a 鈥渟pirit of inquiry.鈥
This isn鈥檛 the first time FIREhas seen Marquette abandon free speech principles. Back in 2006, an administrator removed a purportedly 鈥減atently offensive鈥 quote from the office door of a Ph.D. student. Here鈥檚 the quote, by the hilarious and insightful Dave Barry (who happens to be on the honorary host committee for 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 15th Anniversary Gala this October):
As Americans we must always remember that we all have a common enemy, an enemy that is dangerous, powerful, and relentless. I refer, of course, to the federal government.
Not to be outdone by the humorist, the chair of the philosophy department rationalized the decision by stating that the quote had 鈥渘o obvious academic import.鈥 Such preposterous instances of censorship, if anything, are made more likely by Marquette鈥檚 problematic new training.
See what other protected expression Marquette鈥檚 training program is telling faculty they can鈥檛 engage in at . (As noted at the top of the site, it is not affiliated with the university.)
Marquette鈥檚 poorly conceived training course makes us wonder what other speech-restrictive programs are out there. If you鈥檙e a student or professor who is required to complete a course that chills speech or violates your right to privacy, tell FIREby emailing us at fire@thefire.org.
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.