Table of Contents
Looking for a Straight Answer from Marquette University
Marquette University鈥檚 censorship of a Dave Barry quote was one of the more confounding cases of 2006. Marquette鈥檚 reaction to the quote鈥攁 benign criticism of the government鈥攚ent from baffling to exasperating when administrators tried to justify the censorship, first by claiming that the quote was 鈥減atently offensive,鈥 then that office doors are not 鈥渇ree speech zones,鈥 then that it was only in 鈥渢he context of a complaint鈥 that Marquette is willing to forsake its community members鈥 free speech rights.
In the hope that Marquette will push past these excuses to clarify whether students and faculty are allowed to express themselves in even the most traditional and banal manner, FIRE wrote to Marquette once again on Friday, January 12. This time, we attempted to elicit a direct statement about free speech at Marquette from President Robert Wild by writing:
Despite our numerous correspondences, three questions remain: First, was Stuart Ditsler within his rights to post the Barry quote? Second, are students and faculty free to post materials on their office doors, free from viewpoint discrimination? Third, do students and faculty at Marquette enjoy free speech rights comparable to those at any state college?
Until Marquette abandons its multifarious obfuscations and answers these questions directly, students and faculty remain unsure about the level of free expression that is permissible at Marquette.
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.