果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

Lawsuit Challenges California Speech Code

GLENDORA, CA鈥擳he latest battle in the campaign to free public universities from the scandal of unconstitutional speech codes began today at Citrus College. Chris Stevens, a student, is suing the College for restrictions on free expression that violate his First Amendment rights. The lawsuit, filed on May 20, 2003 by FIRELegal Network attorney Carol A. Sobel in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, challenges Citrus鈥檚 鈥渇ree speech areas.鈥 鈥淏y quarantining free speech from the heart of campus, Citrus College shows contempt for both the ideals of higher education and the most essential values of a free society,鈥 said Greg Lukianoff, director of legal and public advocacy for the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (果冻传媒app官方).

The 鈥渇ree speech areas,鈥 established in 2002, make more than 99% of the campus a censorship area. The policy allows free speech in three small remote areas of the campus. Speakers who express themselves outside of the designated areas actually are arrested, and students face suspension or expulsion merely for engaging in protected speech and activity.

The policy requires notification to the College Security Office not only of one鈥檚 intent to use 鈥渇ree speech areas,鈥 but even the content of one鈥檚 message. No amplification equipment may be used. Use of the three areas is restricted to weekdays from 8am to 6pm, even though more than a third of students take evening classes between 4pm and 10pm. 鈥淯nder this policy,鈥 Lukianoff observed, 鈥淐itrus College forbids its students from holding a 鈥楾ake Back the Night鈥 rally or from protesting in a timely way anything that occurs after dinner.鈥

Stevens directly experienced Citrus College鈥檚 censorship when he sought to hold a 鈥淧ro-America鈥 rally and again when he sought to protest Governor Gray Davis鈥 education budget. Stevens was warned that, as an individual, he was limited to the 鈥渇ree speech areas.鈥 According to the lawsuit, Arnold Rollin, associate dean of students, told Stevens that he would be arrested and expelled if he held any event outside of these areas. Citrus ignored Stevens鈥 petitions to modify the policy.

On November 13, 2002, several pro-life demonstrators were arrested for stepping outside the designated area. Rollin told the demonstrators in the censorship area that they were violating college policy because they were holding signs.

The policy also violates legal equality. Nineteen officially recognized groups have free speech rights denied to individual students and to 鈥渦nrecognized鈥 groups. Official groups, such as the 鈥淐osmetology Club,鈥 are allowed to hold events outside of the designated areas. The complaint alleges that a student may approach others anywhere on campus, hand out literature without permission, and use amplified sound to convey his message if he wants to talk about beauty treatments, but that these basic rights are denied if that same student (or another student) wishes to express his own opinion on fundamental political issues.

Other Citrus College policies that ban constitutionally protected expression on the entire campus may soon face legal challenges. Citrus prohibits 鈥渋ndecent鈥 and 鈥渙ffensive鈥xpression or language.鈥 Its definition of sexual harassment includes 鈥渨ords鈥f a sexual nature.鈥 鈥淒on鈥檛 expect to see much great theater on this campus anytime soon,鈥 said Lukianoff.

Citrus College also restricts freedom of written expression, including freedom of the press, on its campus. All posters, fliers, publications鈥攅ven postcards announcing events鈥攎ust have prior approval from the administration. The College bans any 鈥減ublication鈥濃攊ncluding any letter sent through campus mail鈥攖hat is 鈥渄iscriminatory.鈥 It even requires that all banners 鈥渂e made by a student-artist hired through the Student Affairs Office,鈥 that the banner designs 鈥渂e approved by the Student Affairs staff,鈥 and that the banners 鈥渂e requested no later than five days prior to the time they are needed.鈥

Earlier this year, Citrus College received intense scrutiny for another free speech issue. A professor gave extra credit to students who wrote letters to President Bush opposing the war in Iraq while withholding that credit from students with different views. When contacted by 果冻传媒app官方, Citrus College President Louis Zellers responded admirably, repudiating the professor鈥檚 actions and apologizing to President Bush for the letters. 鈥淐itrus College responded well when a professor discriminated unfairly on the basis of political views,鈥 said 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 Lukianoff. 鈥淲e hope that it now will abandon these unconstitutional policies.鈥

鈥淣o college should want to quarantine, marginalize, or impose prior restraints against free speech,鈥 Lukianoff noted, 鈥渁nd no public college has the legal right to do so. We are thrilled that Chris Stevens and Carol Sobel are defying campus censors. Citrus College must abandon its unreasonable restriction of protected speech to small, remote 鈥榓reas,鈥 and it must put an end to its speech code.鈥

Stevens鈥檚 attorney, Carol A. Sobel, was associate director of the Southern California chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1979 to 1985. She has participated in important challenges to restrictions on the rights to assemble and to demonstrate in California and is the author of numerous articles on free speech and civil liberties.

鈥淐itrus College believes that it may take away rights that this country has guaranteed for over two hundred years,鈥 said Chris Stevens. 鈥淥n a college campus, speech should provoke more speech鈥攏ot threats of punishment, expulsion, or arrest. Citrus College may continue to threaten me, but I will defend my constitutional rights.鈥

FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression, academic freedom, and rights of conscience on our campuses of higher education. The Citrus College speech codes and the lawsuit can be seen at www.thefire.org.

CONTACT:
Greg Lukianoff, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; greg@thefire.org
Thor L. Halvorssen, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; fire@thefire.org

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share