果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

Lafayette College responds to Trump鈥檚 executive order and criticism from 果冻传媒app官方

Watson Hall on the campus of Lafayette College in Easton, Pennsylvania.

Last week, Lafayette College president Alison Byerly President Donald Trump鈥檚 executive order regarding campus free speech. Byerly expressed some concern about its enforcement, yet sounded confident that it would not affect the college 鈥渋n any way鈥 and unconcerned about Lafayette policies flagged by FIREthat do not meet First Amendment standards.

It鈥檚 fair for Byerly to point out that the logistics of enforcement of the order are unknown at this time 鈥 FIREsaid as much in our statement following the order鈥檚 signing, calling the standard by which federal agencies will ensure compliance 鈥渢he order鈥檚 most consequential component.鈥 We also assured that FIREwill watch closely to see if enforcement of the order results in consequences that threaten free expression and academic freedom.

However, Byerly鈥檚 claim that Lafayette has 鈥渧ery good handbook language pertaining to our speech policies鈥 is patently false. For just one example, the introduction to Lafayette鈥檚 code of conduct, appearing in the school鈥檚 , earned our Speech Code of the Month designation this past October for clearly and substantially restricting speech that is protected under First Amendment standards. Specifically, the policy bans 鈥渆motional鈥 and 鈥渕ental harm,鈥 as well as 鈥渁ny activity that harms or demeans others.鈥 Speech doesn鈥檛 lose constitutional protection merely for subjectively demeaning others, and emotional and mental harm are vague terms that could too easily be applied to punish protected speech, like harsh words or teasing.

Lafayette is a private college, but if it wants to continue claiming its policies are consistent with First Amendment principles and with the promises of free speech it makes in official policy materials, it needs to revise its speech codes accordingly.

When asked directly about 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 critique of the Speech Code of the Month policy, Byerly responded that 鈥淸a] lot of other colleges and universities find that they have statements in their handbook that that particular organization doesn鈥檛 support.鈥 Unfortunately, she鈥檚 right about that 鈥 our most recent Spotlight on Speech Codes report found that nearly 90% of the 466 colleges and universities in our Spotlight database maintain at least one policy that restricts free speech. But there鈥檚 no safety in those numbers; policies with the problematic language identified in our database have been routinely struck down by courts and revised as part of settlement agreements.

Whatever the future may hold for enforcement of the executive order on campus free speech, FIREis always available to work collaboratively with college and university administrators and to recommend revisions that would bring policies in line with First Amendment standards.

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share