������ýapp�ٷ�

A former Kennesaw State University cheerleader recently a $145,000 settlement after KSU tried to prevent her from protesting during the national anthem. This large sum reflects the high cost universities pay for violating student-athlete expressive rights.

Several KSU cheerleaders their protest on Sept. 30, 2017, at the second home game of KSU’s football season. Their decision to take a knee during the national anthem reverberated throughout the highest levels of the KSU administration and the Georgia state government. Within days, then-state Rep. Earl Ehrhart then-KSU president Samuel Scott Olens to stop the cheerleaders’ protest. According to between Ehrhart and Cobb County Sheriff Neil Warren, these two individuals successfully convinced Olens to delay the entrance of the cheerleaders onto the field until the national anthem was over for the next home game in October — a decision Olens claims had nothing to do with the protests. 

Student protests in support of the “” throughout October 2017, as the cheerleaders continued to kneel in the out-of-sight tunnel of KSU’s stadium during the national anthem. 

The following month, in the wake of about how Olens caved to political pressure, Olens , allowing the cheerleaders to protest on the field. He that December. 

Student-athletes are students first, athletes second, with expressive rights fully protected by the First Amendment.

On Sept. 5, 2018, one of the cheerleaders filed suit over Olens’s initial denial of her expressive rights — the lawsuit finally settled in October of this year for $145,000.

Many lessons can be learned from this incident. For one, universities should have a plan in place before student-athletes start protesting. ������ýapp�ٷ�’s Statement on College Student-Athletes’ Free Speech Rights is a good place for administrators to start. It covers compelled political and religious speech, whistleblowing, privacy, and other common predicaments colleges face when navigating this issue. Following this statement will help universities protect the free speech right of their student-athletes while ensuring the smooth functioning of their athletic programs.

Second, the situation at KSU should serve as a warning to all state universities bound by the First Amendment that they cannot treat student-athletes as mouthpieces of the administration or the government. Student-athletes are students first, athletes second, with expressive rights fully protected by the First Amendment. If leaders of public colleges or universities want to show opposition to their student-athletes’ expression, it may not come at the expense of those student-athletes’ rights. 

The KSU cheerleader’s settlement should give universities at least 145,000 additional reasons to choose the higher path of upholding, rather than stifling, the rights of their student-athletes.