Table of Contents
Judge Rejects Every Argument in Iowa State鈥檚 Motion to Dismiss Free Speech Case
AMES, Iowa, January 7, 2015鈥擸esterday, an Iowa federal judge denied Iowa State University鈥檚 (ISU鈥檚) motion to dismiss a First Amendment lawsuit filed by students. Chief Judge James Gritzner of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa rejected every one of ISU鈥檚 arguments in his 19-page order. This is the first time a judge has ruled in a case brought as part of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education鈥檚 (果冻传媒app官方鈥檚) . Three other lawsuits in the project have already been settled in favor of free speech, for a total of $210,000 in fees and damages.
鈥淲e鈥檙e very pleased with the court鈥檚 decision to deny every part of ISU鈥檚 motion to dismiss,鈥 said FIREPresident Greg Lukianoff. 鈥淔IRElooks forward to a successful outcome that affirms ISU students鈥 right to freely advocate for their beliefs.鈥
Student-plaintiff Erin Furleigh said, 鈥淚t feels so good to know the facts can鈥檛 be ignored anymore.鈥
Furleigh and fellow student Paul Gerlich, the vice president and president, respectively, of ISU鈥檚 student chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), sued ISU in July 2014 as part of 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 Stand Up For Speech Litigation Project. In their complaint, the students detailed how the university censored the group鈥檚 T-shirts based on their marijuana-related messaging and imagery, removed NORML ISU鈥檚 advisor, and implemented new guidelines for using ISU鈥檚 trademark in order to restrict NORML ISU鈥檚 speech. Attorneys at the Washington, D.C., office of the law firm , which represents Gerlich and Furleigh, argued that ISU鈥檚 actions amounted to censorship that violates the First Amendment.
In response, ISU filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that the case was a matter of trademark use and not a free speech issue. The university also argued that NORML ISU鈥檚 T-shirts constituted government speech. Other grounds on which ISU sought dismissal include sovereign immunity, qualified immunity, and procedural due process.
The court refused to dismiss the case on any of these grounds. With respect to the trademark argument, the court鈥檚 order states that 鈥淸n]o infringement is involved in the case at hand,鈥 confirming that NORML ISU鈥檚 right to advocate for marijuana legalization is a First Amendment issue. Furthermore, the judge鈥檚 order noted that well-established case law 鈥渉old[s] that college administrators cannot control the speech of campus groups because of disagreements with the groups鈥 viewpoints.鈥 Judge Gritzner also allowed Gerlich and Furleigh to pursue their claim against ISU President Steven Leath in his personal capacity for violating their constitutional rights.
The case鈥檚 discovery process, in which the parties exchange documents and take depositions, will continue until June; trial is scheduled for December 2015.
FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, freedom of expression, academic freedom, due process, and rights of conscience at our nation鈥檚 colleges and universities. 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 efforts to preserve liberty on campuses across America can be viewed at thefire.org.
CONTACT:
Katie Barrows, Communications Coordinator, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; katie@thefire.org
Catherine Sevcenko, Associate Director of Litigation, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; catherine@thefire.org
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.