Table of Contents
āHunting Groundā Filmmakers to Harvard Law Profs: Criticizing Our Film Could Create a 'Hostile Climate'

Last month, a group of 19 Harvard Law School professors issued a denouncing the film The Hunting Ground as āpropagandaā and condemning its āunfair and misleading portrayalā of the case of Harvard Law student Brandon Winston. from the law school for an alleged sexual assault, but later reinstated after faculty reversed the decision.
According to the professorsā press release:
With respect to Mr. Winston, the film gives the impression that he, like others accused in the stories featured in the film, is guilty of sexual assault by force and the use of drugs on his alleged victims, and that he, like the others accused, is a repeat sexual predator.
These allegations, the professors state, create a āseriously false pictureā of Winstonās case.
In a statement emailed to The Harvard Crimson and reported yesterday, Hunting Ground director Kirby Dick and producer Amy Ziering suggest that the professorsā criticism of the film :
āThe Harvard Law professorsā letter is irresponsible and raises an important question about whether the very public bias these professors have shown in favor of an assailant contributes to a hostile climate at Harvard Law,ā Dick and Ziering wrote.
To say this assertion is ludicrous is an understatement. Unfortunately, that doesnāt mean it isnāt worth taking seriously. After all, the Department of Educationās Office for Civil Rights (OCR) into the University of Mary Washington (UMW) in Virginia in part because students alleged that a letter from the university president defending UMW against allegations of discrimination constituted āretaliationā in violation of Title IX. Similarly, Northwestern University investigated Professor Laura Kipnis earlier this year for alleged Title IX violations after she wrote about what she called the āsexual panicā on campus.
So while FIREwould hope that any Title IX complaint filed against the professors for their criticism of The Hunting Ground would be shut down immediately, we have little faith in the good sense of either university administrations or OCR in over the issue of campus sexual assault. ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½, therefore, will be keeping a very close eye on this story.
UPDATED: Harvard Law School professor Jeannie Suk, of campus due process and one of the 19 signatories to the press release, provided FIREthis response to the filmmakersā statement:
It's insulting to sexual assault victims to suggest that raising challenges to a film's veracity, accuracy, and fairness is contributing to a sexually hostile climate. But it exemplifies the reckless way some people use the concept of a hostile environment these days, to the detriment of victims and serious treatment of sexual assault.
Earlier today, Suk expressed her displeasure with the situation on Twitter:
Know: if actually accused of violating Title IX because of our criticism of we will not be allowed to speak about that.
ā Jeannie Suk (@JeannieSuk)
Recent Articles
FIREās award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Maineās censure of lawmaker for post about trans student-athlete is an attack on free speech

Trumpās border czar is wrong about AOC

FIREcalls out 60 Minutes investigation as 'political stunt' in comment to FCC
