果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

Duquesne University law professor Jacob H. Rooksby over at HigherEducationLaw, and it鈥檚 a stunner: Administrators at The Evergreen State College are refusing to let a student theater troupe perform an original work on university property because they鈥檙e worried that the production, which includes parodies of Disney songs, might trigger liability for copyright infringement.

Here鈥檚 the story:

Eight students there spent the spring quarter writing, rehearsing, and preparing to perform publicly an original musical theater production entitled 鈥淭he Quisney Project presents: O.U.T.: Once Upon a Time.鈥  Informed by queer theory, the work is a critical and political commentary on heterosexuality norms in American society.  Professors were involved in supervising and approving the project, which was scheduled to be performed this weekend in campus facilities.

Evergreen State College鈥檚 administration was supportive of the project initially.  However, after consulting with a state attorney, the administration apparently changed its tune, writing the students in late May to advise them that the musical could not be performed on college property in its present form.  Their concern?  Potential .

The students鈥 musical production apparently incorporates several Disney songs, which the students use to criticize and parody Disney as 鈥 in their view 鈥 a company that perpetuates gender norms through its songs and movies.

Rooksby reports that faculty have tried to convince the administrators that the serious threat here isn鈥檛 to the university via a copyright suit, but rather to free speech at Evergreen via censorship:

Faculty familiar with the project, and supportive of it, believe that the students鈥 use of Disney songs in the musical constitutes 鈥渇air use鈥 under copyright law, as the musical 鈥渟ignificantly alters the meaning of original melodies and lyrics, and offers critical commentary upon the original.鈥  They also characterize the administration鈥檚 efforts to move the musical off campus as 鈥渙verzealous,鈥 motivated by a narrow view of copyright law鈥檚 fair use provision, and likely to produce 鈥渇ar-reaching and dangerous consequences for the intellectual life of The Evergreen State College.鈥

In a development that will strike regular Torch readers as unsurprising, Rooksby reports that the administration isn鈥檛 budging. No location is listed for the event on the school鈥檚 calendar; instead, interested attendees have to write the event鈥檚 organizers directly to learn where they might be able to watch the performance.

My colleagues urged me to fit as many Disney-related puns into this blog entry as I could, but this story leaves me too to get myself up in such a endeavor. Besides, Rooksby gets it just right:

For now, questionable concerns for copyright infringement seem to have frozen, or at least chilled, at Evergreen College that which should be presumptively permitted on college campuses everywhere: probing, student-driven, thought-provoking speech, unfettered by content restrictions that do not advance compelling institutional interests.  Absent unassailable evidence that the musical鈥檚 inclusion of Disney songs is not permitted by fair use, my hope would be that Evergreen College administrators would take their cue from Disney and let this one go.

I strongly agree. Be sure to read . Further information, including the faculty鈥檚 open letter and a response from the Dean鈥檚 office, is available at the .

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share