果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

Hamline hiding critical Twitter, Facebook posts amid blasphemy ban controversy

The Prophet Muhammad isn鈥檛 the only thing the university doesn鈥檛 want you to see.
Hamline University sign entrance

Ken Wolter / Shutterstock.com

Entrance to Hamline University, where administrators are under fire for not renewing the teaching contract of an adjunct professor who showed an image of the Prophet Muhammad in an art history class.

Already embroiled in a controversy over its firing of an art history professor who showed depicting the Prophet Muhammad, Hamline University 鈥 which publicly to free expression but privately implements sectarian limits on 鈥 is now hiding critical posts on its social media.

Since late December, when about the nonrenewal of the adjunct professor, since as art history scholar Erika L贸pez Prater, Hamline鈥檚 social media posts have been inundated with criticism. And as criticism poured in, Hamline University scrubbed it out, hiding critical tweets and Facebook comments replying to its social media posts.

Image of a retweet about 果冻传媒app官方's letter to Hamline University

This is most apparent from the university鈥檚 Twitter account, where users can still uncover hidden replies if they know to look for a small icon indicating that tweets have been hidden. The replies 鈥 hidden from almost in the last month 鈥 range in tenor and content. While some are anti-Islamic screeds, some merely republish the image at issue (a widely-shared 14th century painting contained in an Islamic history compendium by Rashid-al-Din), while others offer pointed criticism of the university for violating L贸pez Prater鈥檚 academic freedom and limiting the material available to students based on their cohorts鈥 religious beliefs. 

The university鈥檚 efforts to purge replies on its Facebook posts are less discernible, but there are signs Hamline has been removing posts there, too. This Facebook about inclement weather, for example, at one point indicated that it has 35 comments. But Hamline has been hiding those comments, including several that had been posted after The New York Times . 

Facebook reply hidden by Hamline University

Universities cannot claim to foster a culture of free expression when they鈥檙e sanitizing their social media feeds and shutting down discussion on important campus issues. What message does it send to students and faculty about tolerance for dissent if the university is busily scrubbing criticism from public view? Clearly Hamline faculty do want their voices heard on this issue, as evidenced by the numerous Hamline professors who signed on to our open Faculty Letter to the university president. Their names appear alongside almost 300 other faculty members from around the world.

Hamline is not the first institution to stumble into censorship as a means of suppressing criticism of its censorship. In 2021, as Emerson College faced pushback over its targeting of a conservative student organization that criticized China鈥檚 government, the school scrubbed from its social media feeds references to Winnie the Pooh (which are often deployed by dissidents as a caricature of Xi Jinping, president of the People鈥檚 Republic of China). And as FIREfound in a 2020 report, public universities often used Facebook鈥檚 content filtering tools to automatically hide comments critical of administrators, donors, corporate partners, faculty, and more 鈥 with the goal of 鈥渢ransforming their pages from public forums into vehicles for positive publicity.鈥

Image of a retweet about 果冻传媒app官方's letter to Hamline University

Courts have said it violates the First Amendment when government actors engage in this kind of censorship. When public entities 鈥 like public universities 鈥 open social media forums for discussion, they cannot censor comments or posts because of the views expressed.

Private universities like Hamline don鈥檛 have to commit to free expression. We think it鈥檚 wise when they do, and most private colleges and universities 鈥 including Hamline 鈥 pursue that course. After all, a robust free speech culture alongside academic freedom attracts top-notch students and faculty, earns schools prestigious regional , and gives the institution general credibility. 

Hamline it 鈥渃elebrates free expression for everyone鈥 and 鈥渆mbraces the examination of all ideas, some of which will potentially be unpopular and unsettling.鈥 But the university鈥檚 actions 鈥 toward faculty teaching controversial topics and members of the community using social media to hold administrators accountable 鈥 suggest the opposite.


FIRE defends the rights of students and faculty members 鈥 no matter their views 鈥 at public and private universities and colleges in the United States. If you are a student or a faculty member facing investigation or punishment for your speech, . If you鈥檙e faculty member at a public college or university, call the Faculty Legal Defense Fund 24-hour hotline at 254-500-FLDF (3533). If you鈥檙e a college journalist facing censorship or a media law question, call the Student Press Freedom Initiative 24-hour hotline at 717-734-SPFI (7734).

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share