¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½

Table of Contents

Former FIREIntern: University of Delawareā€™s ā€˜Single Investigator Modelā€™ is Bad for ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½

This weekā€™s issue of , University of Delawareā€™s (UDā€™s) student paper, features an editorial by former FIREintern Rachael Russell on the universityā€™s adoption of a ā€œsingle investigator modelā€ for sexual misconduct investigations. In her editorial, Rachael looks at the threats to accused studentsā€™ due process rights that occur when one person is both the investigator and judge in a case.

As Rachael explains, UDā€™s policy change allows a lot of room for bias to seep into sexual misconduct investigations:

The new policy indicates that one trained professional will investigate a report of sexual misconduct and conclude whether the respondent is guilty or not. This construct allows one individual to act as detective, judge and jury by single-handedly deciding the fate of the accused. By allowing one person to act in all of these roles, there is no check on the investigatorā€™s power. That individualā€™s biases and mistakes may persist in an investigation unrestrained.

Read Rachaelā€™s full editorial at .

Do you want to be a voice on campus like Rachael? Check out FIREā€™s summer internship program!

Recent Articles

FIREā€™s award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share