Table of Contents
FIREopposes proposed DEIA regulations at California Community Colleges
On April 22, FIREsent a public comment to the California Community Colleges Board of Governors opposing proposed regulations which would add diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility standards to the evaluation and tenure review of community college employees. The proposed regulations, if enacted, pose significant academic freedom concerns and would violate the First Amendment rights of faculty members at CCC institutions.
The regulations would direct CCC鈥檚 chancellor to 鈥渁dopt and publish a guidance describing DEIA competencies and criteria鈥 to be 鈥渦tilized in community college district performance evaluations of employees and faculty tenure reviews.鈥 The proposed regulations further state that the 鈥渆valuation process shall provide employees an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding of DEIA and anti-racist principles, including how the employee has operationalized DEIA in the performance of their job responsibilities.鈥
The proposed regulations define 鈥渁nti-racist鈥 as 鈥減olicies and actions that lead to racial equity.鈥 The regulations further state:
Faculty members shall employ teaching and learning practices and curriculum that reflect DEIA and anti-racist principles, and in particular respect for, and acknowledgement, of the diverse backgrounds of students and colleagues to improve equitable student outcomes and course completion.
As we noted in our public comment, FIREis concerned that the proposed regulations require 鈥渇aculty members to affirm certain perspectives on disputed political and ideological issues and to embed those perspectives in their academic activities.鈥
Such a requirement runs afoul of faculty member鈥檚 free speech and academic freedom rights. As we wrote:
As a public community college system, CCC is bound by the First Amendment, under which the government 鈥may not compel affirmance of a belief with which the speaker disagrees.鈥 that the 鈥済overnment may not condition employment on taking an oath that one has not or will not engage in protected speech, such as criticizing government policy or discussing political doctrine.鈥
We further warned that the DEIA Implementation Workgroup鈥檚 鈥渞ecommended competencies鈥 would violate faculty members鈥 rights, stating:
Faculty members would, for instance, have to acknowledge the correctness of certain beliefs (e.g., the role of racial and cultural identities in 鈥渃reating structures of oppression and marginalization,鈥 and the harm caused by one鈥檚 鈥渋nternal biases鈥) and actively promote CCC鈥檚 ideological conception of DEIA in their teaching, research and service activities, such as by 鈥淸d]evelop[ing] and implement[ing] a pedagogy and/or curriculum that promotes a race-conscious and intersectional lens.鈥
Just as FIREopposes compelling professors to express certain viewpoints to be considered for promotion or tenure, we鈥檝e also opposed efforts in a number of states that would prohibit those and related viewpoints from being taught in collegiate classrooms. FIREwill intervene whenever and wherever academic freedom is threatened, regardless of the political or ideological motivations behind the threats.
We will keep our readers updated on developments in California.
- Academic Freedom
- College Governance
- Faculty Rights
- Free Speech
- California Community Colleges: Proposed Regulations Adding Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Criteria to Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review
- Palsgaard v. Christian: California Community Colleges administrators compel professors to parrot the state鈥檚 views on DEIA in the classroom
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.