Table of Contents
FIREto Hood College: You can鈥檛 fire faculty for backlash to their political views
Today, FIREwrote Hood College based on that the school fired a tenured professor after a video went viral in which the professor called conservatives 鈥渢he enemy鈥 and discussed being a 鈥渘onbinary immigrant lesbian.鈥
On May 4, a popular conservative Twitter account, Libs of TikTok, posted a of professor Simone Kolysh calling conservatives 鈥渢he enemy鈥 and saying conservatives would 鈥渓ose the war鈥 because 鈥渁nti-trans, anti-LGBTQ, anti-women legislation galvanizes . . . Gen Xers in a way we鈥檝e never seen before.鈥 In response, thousands of Twitter users liked, retweeted, and commented on Libs of TikTok鈥檚 post 鈥 and many tagged Hood College and called for Kolysh to be fired.
In a now-deleted tweet, Kolysh said:
Today I got fired from my tenure track job because some students said I spoke 鈥榓bout Black people too much鈥 and 鈥榮pread lesbianism鈥 and the administration was like, 鈥榗ool, legit鈥 and for my TikTok where I said I hate conservatives for roe v wade. Know I am well. ?
Based on Kolysh鈥檚 tweet and an by the Daily Caller, FIREwrote Hood College today to explain that, if this is true, the school violated its commitments to faculty academic freedom rights by firing Kolysh because of this speech.
If reports that Kolysh was fired based on viewpoint are accurate, Hood College must immediately return Kolysh to the classroom.
Regardless of the pushback or content of speech 鈥 so long as it does not fall into a narrow category of unprotected speech, like true threats or incitement, which Kolysh鈥檚 speech here does not 鈥 imposing punishment for protected expression contravenes Hood College鈥檚 promise that 鈥渇aculty may write about and discuss freely any subject of intellectual inquiry and shall not be subject to censorship, discipline, or intimidation.鈥
As we wrote the college:
Given Hood College鈥檚 clear and strong commitments to faculty free expression, it may not punish or fire faculty members like Kolysh for expressing their views, regardless of the speech鈥檚 content or the negative attention the college received. The 鈥渂edrock principle underlying鈥 freedom of expression is that speech may not be limited 鈥渟imply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable[.]鈥 It is this counter-majoritarian principle that protects 鈥渋nsulting, and even outrageous, speech in order to provide adequate breathing space鈥 to public debate, recognizing that those with authority 鈥渃annot make principled distinctions鈥 in determining what speech is sufficiently offensive to suppress.
The subjectively controversial nature of expression does not give the college free reign to violate its free expression promises. If reports that Kolysh was fired based on viewpoint are accurate, Hood College must immediately return Kolysh to the classroom and publicly reaffirm to faculty that the college will honor its commitments to faculty expressive and academic freedom rights.
FIRE asked Hood College to respond to our letter by June 22. We鈥檒l keep readers updated as to any new developments.
FIRE defends the rights of students and faculty members 鈥 no matter their views 鈥 at public and private universities and colleges in the United States. If you are a student or a faculty member facing investigation or punishment for your speech, submit your case to FIREtoday. If you鈥檙e faculty member at a public college or university, call the Faculty Legal Defense Fund 24-hour hotline at 254-500-FLDF (3533). If you鈥檙e a college journalist facing censorship or a media law question, call the Student Press Freedom Initiative 24-hour hotline at 717-734-SPFI (7734).
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.