Table of Contents
Education Dept. issues new Title IX regs with crucial campus due process protections, adopts Supreme Court sexual harassment definition
WASHINGTON, May 6, 2020 鈥 Advocates for free speech and due process on campus won one of their biggest-ever victories today with the finalization of long-awaited new Department of Education Title IX regulations.
The regulations guarantee critical due process protections that Americans recognize as essential to securing justice, but that have for too long been denied to students accused of sexual misconduct on college campuses. The regulations also include important protections for student free speech rights.
鈥淔or nearly a decade, FIREled the charge to introduce fairness to campus proceedings, first nearly alone, then with a growing number of allies,鈥 said FIREExecutive Director Robert Shibley. 鈥淭oday, we won an important victory. But our work is not over. We will continue to fight to ensure that students are afforded the rights now guaranteed to them when they return to campus this fall.鈥
Among the procedural protections guaranteed by the new regulations are:
- An express presumption of innocence;
- live hearings with cross-examination conducted by an advisor of choice, who may be an attorney;
- sufficient time and information 鈥 including access to evidence 鈥 to prepare for interviews and a hearing;
- impartial investigators and decision-makers;
- a requirement that all relevant evidence receive an objective evaluation.
The regulations also affirm institutions鈥 ability to use the 鈥渃lear and convincing鈥 standard of evidence, which the government previously forced schools to abandon in 2011 for the lower 鈥減reponderance鈥 standard in sexual misconduct cases.
Finally, the regulations define 鈥渟exual harassment鈥 as it was defined by the Supreme Court of the United States in Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education (1999). This definition provides a clear path for institutions to respond to allegations of misconduct while also protecting students鈥 expressive rights.
In September 2017, the department rescinded its controversial 2011 鈥淒ear Colleague鈥 letter, which denied students important due process protections in campus sexual misconduct proceedings. The 2011 letter sowed confusion among administrators and prompted from individuals who alleged they were denied a fair process. In 2018, the department proposed new regulations to address the problem, beginning what would become an 18-month process of seeking public input.
Today, that process culminated in binding regulations scheduled to take effect on August 14, 2020.
***
The 2011 Dear Colleague letter and accompanying mandated the use of a low standard of proof for findings of guilt and strongly discouraged cross-examination, which the Supreme Court identified as 鈥渢he greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.鈥
The Dear Colleague letter kicked off of aggressive Title IX enforcement that led schools nationwide to crack down on protected student and faculty expression and eliminate procedural protections in an effort to avoid federal investigation and the possible loss of federal funding. Many institutions eliminated hearings and cross-examination altogether.
Since 2011, FIREhas led the fight against the erosion of due process rights on campus through the abuse of Title IX, the that prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded educational programs.
FIRE repeatedly warned the Department of Education and institutions nationwide about the consequences of censoring student expression and eliminating due process protections under the guise of addressing sexual harassment. FIREstaff wrote countless articles explaining the risk of erroneous guilty findings, provided congressional testimony about the federal policy鈥檚 failures, and sponsored a federal lawsuit challenging the Dear Colleague letter鈥檚 legality under the .
Last year, FIREsubmitted a formal comment to the Department of Education after it solicited feedback on its . FIRELegislative and Policy Director Joe Cohn argued that the 鈥減roposed rules take the rights of both complainants and accused students seriously, and they make important strides toward ensuring that complaints of sexual misconduct will be neither ignored nor prejudged.鈥
Since the 2011 鈥淒ear Colleague鈥 letter was issued, students have filed more than against colleges for allegedly conducting unfair disciplinary processes. Many of these lawsuits have been successful, as 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 Campus Due Process Litigation Tracker shows.
A study released by FIREin December found that college students are routinely denied even the most basic elements of a fair hearing. Nearly three-quarters of America鈥檚 top universities do not even expressly guarantee students they will be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and just slightly more than half of schools explicitly require that fact-finders 鈥 the institution鈥檚 version of judge and/or jury 鈥 be impartial.
鈥淔IREshouldn鈥檛 have to relinquish their basic rights when they step foot on a college campus, but at almost every top college in this country, that鈥檚 exactly what happens,鈥 said FIRESenior Fellow Samantha Harris. 鈥淪exual misconduct is a gravely serious offense for which the punishment must be substantial. The department鈥檚 new regulations require schools to provide students with a fundamentally fair process before imposing these life-altering consequences.鈥
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of students and faculty members at America鈥檚 colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience 鈥 the essential qualities of liberty.
CONTACT:
Daniel Burnett, Assistant Director of Communications, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; media@thefire.org
- Due Process
- Free Speech
- Litigation
- Harassment
- Freedom of Conscience
- Faculty Rights
- U.S. Department of Education enacts new Title IX regulations requiring procedural safeguards in campus disciplinary hearings, adopts Supreme Court sexual harassment definition
- U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights April 4, 2011, Guidance Letter Reduces Due Process Protections
- Departments of Education and Justice: National "Blueprint" for Unconstitutional Speech Codes
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.