果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

Department of Justice files Statement of Interest in 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 Brown v. JCJC, compares campus rules to Orwell鈥檚 鈥楴ineteen Eighty-Four鈥

(Christopher E Zimmer/Shutterstock)

Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a in a lawsuit filed in September by FIREagainst Mississippi鈥檚 Jones County Junior College as part of 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 . The DOJ鈥檚 statement, accompanied by a , forcefully argues that 鈥減ublic colleges cannot trample on their students鈥 First Amendment rights to free speech.鈥      

Our lawsuit raises a First Amendment challenge to the college鈥檚 policies requiring administrative approval, at least three days in advance, for all 鈥渕eetings or gatherings鈥 on campus and giving administrators discretion over whether to schedule an event. Plaintiff and former student Mike Brown alleges that he was stopped by campus police twice for attempting to speak with fellow students about free speech and civil liberties issues without the college鈥檚 permission. 

鈥淪uch extreme preconditions to speech might not be out of place in Oceania, the fictional dystopian superstate in George Orwell鈥檚 Nineteen Eighty-Four,鈥 the DOJ wrote in its statement. 鈥淭he First Amendment to the United States Constitution, however, ensures that preconditions like these have no place in the United States of America.鈥

The statement argues that Jones College鈥檚 speech codes are constitutionally unsound for several reasons:

JCJC鈥檚 speech policies do not pass First Amendment muster in at least two major respects: they operate as a prior restraint on all student speech and contain no exception for individuals or small groups; and they further grant school officials unbridled discretion to determine which students may speak, and about what they might speak.

The DOJ took no position on a pending motion to dismiss filed by defendants in October, which argues that plaintiffs lack standing to pursue their claims and that certain defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. Rather, the Department notes that defendants 鈥渢ellingly make no effort to reconcile JCJC鈥檚 speech policies with the First Amendment,鈥 and argues that 鈥渞egardless of whether this particular case may proceed, JCJC, as a public institution of higher education, has a freestanding obligation to comply with the First Amendment.鈥 To that end, the DOJ gives the college some pointed advice: 

As a public institution of higher education, JCJC should be encouraging speech, not stifling it. Its unconstitutional conduct cannot stand. JCJC need not鈥攁nd should not鈥攚ait for a court with jurisdiction to steamroll it into compliance. It should comply voluntarily with the First Amendment鈥攁nd soon.

The DOJ statement comes only a week after FIREannounced that Jackson State University eliminated or revised all of its speech policies that conflicted with the First Amendment, becoming the sixth institution in Mississippi to earn the highest, 鈥green light鈥 rating from 果冻传媒app官方. With that, Mississippi became the second state, after Arizona, to have all of its rated universities earn a green light rating.

Yesterday, the nation鈥檚 highest law enforcement agency made clear its view that Jones College should stop bucking this statewide trend and act to uphold its students鈥 First Amendment rights. 

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share