果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

Campus free speech orgs seek to intervene in lawsuit to defend new Title IX regulations

Education Dept. issues new Title IX regs with crucial campus due process protections, adopts Supreme Court sexual harassment definition

WASHINGTON, June 24, 2020 鈥 Today, a coalition of organizations that support free speech on campus filed a petition in federal court asking to participate in litigation surrounding the Department of Education鈥檚 new . 

The petition from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, , and seeks to defend the free speech protections established by the department against a lawsuit filed by the ACLU. , if successful, would stop the protections from going into effect.

Specifically, 果冻传媒app官方, Speech First, and Independent Women鈥檚 Law Center are asking the court鈥檚 permission to 鈥渋ntervene鈥 in the lawsuit in order to argue that the Department of Education鈥檚 definition of peer-on-peer harassment is not only permissible but required by the First Amendment.

The department鈥檚 definition of harassment comes from the 1999 Supreme Court case Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education. In the case, actionable sexual harassment was defined as conduct 鈥渟o severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive鈥 that it effectively denies a person equal access to education. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Sandra Day O鈥機onnor and joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsberg, John Paul Stevens, David Souter, and Stephen Breyer, emphasized that schools must take care not to 鈥渙ver-comply鈥 with Title IX by censoring protected speech. 

Over the years, campus authorities have employed unconstitutional harassment policies that are inconsistent with Davis to stifle expression and punish students and faculty members. While the ACLU鈥檚 lawsuit argues that the new Title IX regulations鈥 use of the Davis standard is discriminatory toward women, the coalition argues that the Department of Education was required to adopt the Davis standard in order to ensure that college harassment policies are in line with the First Amendment. 

鈥淔or more than a generation, colleges have used bogus sexual harassment definitions and transparent double standards to punish students and faculty for expression that is protected by law and often not even that controversial off campus,鈥 said FIREExecutive Director Robert Shibley. 鈥淏y incorporating the Supreme Court鈥檚 definition of sexual harassment and finally complying with the First Amendment, the new Title IX regulations seek to end this abuse. This change should be cheered, not challenged, by civil liberties organizations.鈥

鈥淔or far too long, universities made a conscious decision to sacrifice the First Amendment on the altar of Title IX,鈥 said Speech First President Nicole Neily. 鈥淎cross the country, our student members鈥 speech rights have been chilled by overbroad harassment policies that were encouraged by the previous administration鈥檚 overreach. The Davis standard is not only the appropriate standard for campus speech 鈥 it is the constitutionally required one.鈥

Jennifer C. Braceras, director of Independent Women鈥檚 Law Center said, 鈥淪chools may not violate the First Amendment rights of faculty and students on the ground that certain speech offends the sensibilities of certain women on campus. The department鈥檚 new rule is not only good policy, it is compelled by law.鈥

***

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education is a nonpartisan, nonprofit student rights organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of students and faculty members at America鈥檚 colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience 鈥 the essential qualities of liberty.

is the leading national women鈥檚 organization dedicated to developing and advancing policies that aren鈥檛 just well-intended, but actually enhance people鈥檚 freedom, opportunities, and well-being. IWF oversees the Independent Women鈥檚 Law Center, which advocates for equal opportunity, individual liberty, and respect for the American constitutional order.

is a nationwide membership organization of students, alumni, and other concerned citizens; the organization is dedicated to preserving civil rights secured by law, including the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment.

CONTACT:

Daniel Burnett, Assistant Director of Communications, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; media@thefire.org

Elizabeth Tew, Communications Manager, Independent Women鈥檚 Forum: 910-988-0726; elizabeth.tew@iwf.org 

John Gage, Speech First Account Executive, CRC Advisors: 402-730-2637; jgage@crcadvisors.com 

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share