Table of Contents
Brooklyn College Threatens Inquisition to Silence Dissenting Professor
BROOKLYN, N.Y., September 8, 2005鈥擨n a direct attack on academic freedom and free speech, the Brooklyn College School of Education (SOE) is seeking to silence one of its most prominent critics, history professor K. C. Johnson. After publicly criticizing perceived indoctrination and viewpoint discrimination by members of the Brooklyn College faculty, Johnson is facing a possible investigation by a Brooklyn College 鈥淚ntegrity Committee鈥 for his constitutionally protected speech.
Johnson has criticized the SOE鈥檚 use of 鈥渄ispositions鈥 theory, which holds that professors should evaluate students鈥 commitment to 鈥渟ocial justice鈥 along with academic achievement. On June 7, officials from the college鈥檚 faculty union insinuated that Johnson鈥檚 exercise of his First Amendment rights had threatened 鈥渁cademic freedom.鈥 Shortly thereafter, he received an official letter signed by dozens of education professors demanding that he cease his 鈥渁ttacks鈥 on the SOE.
鈥淏rooklyn College鈥檚 conduct shows an incredible misunderstanding of academic freedom,鈥 remarked David French, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (果冻传媒app官方), which has written to the college on Johnson鈥檚 behalf. 鈥淲hen Professor Johnson dared to question Brooklyn College鈥檚 official orthodoxy, his colleagues confused his criticism with 鈥榗ensorship.鈥 Now he may be facing an investigation for exercising his right to dissent.鈥
Johnson鈥檚 latest trouble began on May 23, when he published an article in Inside Higher Ed expressing reservations about the national trend toward using 鈥渄ispositions鈥 theory, which he believes applies an ideological litmus test to prospective public school teachers. A few days later, Johnson was quoted in a similar article in the New York Sun. Both pieces mentioned advisees of Johnson who thought they had been penalized by SOE professors for their views.
In response to Johnson鈥檚 criticisms, the faculty union鈥檚 Professional Staff Congress held an 鈥渆mergency academic freedom鈥 meeting on June 7, where officials insinuated that the Faculty Council鈥檚 鈥淚ntegrity Committee鈥 would investigate him. Then, on June 20, a letter on SOE letterhead was sent to Johnson, Brooklyn College President Christoph M. Kimmich, City University of New York (CUNY) Chancellor Matthew Goldstein, every Brooklyn College department chair, and every member of the CUNY Board of Trustees. The letter opened by claiming to respect Johnson鈥檚 freedom of speech, but quickly demanded that he stop his 鈥渁ttacks鈥 on a colleague, on the SOE, and on the use of 鈥渄ispositions鈥濃攖hat is, that he give up his right to comment on an issue of public concern.
Johnson defended his rights and clarified some misstatements of fact in the SOE letter in a July 29 reply, but has received no response from the administration or Faculty Council. He has not received any official notification of the possible investigation into his views.
Brooklyn College鈥檚 actions are even more troubling given the school鈥檚 poor track record on academic freedom. Brooklyn College suspended its student government last year for passing a resolution in favor of a bill promoting student and faculty rights, only backing down when FIRE intervened. And in 2002, the college conducted a secret investigation of Professor Johnson鈥檚 viewpoint during a tenure dispute.
FIRE wrote President Kimmich on August 18, asking him to recognize Johnson鈥檚 free speech rights; to inform Johnson if there is an investigation into his views or expression; and if there is such an investigation, to end it. President Kimmich has so far ignored 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 request for a response, leaving the status of Johnson鈥檚 First Amendment rights open to question.
鈥淏rooklyn College is no stranger to secret investigations. If, as threatened, K. C. Johnson is under investigation for criticizing the college, this investigation must cease. Few forms of speech are more clearly protected than a professor鈥檚 right to criticize pedagogical standards he or she may find unsound or unfair,鈥 stated FIREDirector of Legal and Public Advocacy Greg Lukianoff. 鈥淏rooklyn College must confirm that it tolerates dissent, that it is not conducting another secret investigation of one of its own professors, and that it accepts free speech and academic freedom鈥攅ven when that dissent shines a light on the college鈥檚 own abuses.鈥
FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression, academic freedom, and rights of conscience at our nation鈥檚 colleges and universities. 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 efforts to preserve liberty on campuses across America can be viewed at thefire.org.
CONTACT:
David French, President, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; david@thefire.org
Greg Lukianoff, Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; greg@thefire.org
Christoph M. Kimmich, President, Brooklyn College: 718-951-5671; cmk@brooklyn.cuny.edu
Recent Articles
FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.